1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0363(19990915)31:1<275::aid-fld968>3.0.co;2-a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application ofh-adaptation for environmental fluid flow and species transport

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Today, adaptive techniques have been adopted in many commercial CFD codes and used by many researchers over a wide range of applications [5][6][7][8][9]. However, application of such techniques to atmospheric models has been very limited [10,11], even though there has been numerous adaptive models developed over many years [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Adaptive Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today, adaptive techniques have been adopted in many commercial CFD codes and used by many researchers over a wide range of applications [5][6][7][8][9]. However, application of such techniques to atmospheric models has been very limited [10,11], even though there has been numerous adaptive models developed over many years [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Adaptive Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been demonstrated that hp-adaptive FEM is one of the best mesh-based schemes [14]. The application of h-adaptive FEM has seen limited use in literature for solving environmental transport problems [13] [15]. To the best of our knowledge, no one has reported the use of hp-adaptive FEM for solving atmospheric contaminant dispersion in the existing literature.…”
Section: Hp-adaptive Finite Element Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many types of spatially adaptive approaches exist: (1) h methods, which refine the mesh while maintaining fixedorder approximations [46,84,74]; (2) p methods, which change the order of the approximation over elements while maintaining the same mesh pattern [92,5,22]; (3) r methods, which relocate a fixed number of grid points over the domain to minimize an error measure [24]; and (4) m methods, which switch spatial approximation methods in different regions to achieve improved performance [41,39]. Combinations of these methods are also common, such as rh methods [66,82], mh methods [39,20], and hp methods [44,80,85,9,53].…”
Section: Spatial Adaptionmentioning
confidence: 99%