2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41569-021-00527-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applications of artificial intelligence in cardiovascular imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 145 publications
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ML models have been utilized successfully and extensively in arrhythmia risk assessment (Feeny et al, 2020 ; Krittanawong et al, 2020 ) and in cardiovascular imaging, to diverse ends (Prakosa et al, 2013 ; Bernard et al, 2018 ; Sermesant et al, 2021 ). More recently, compound, explainable ML models have demonstrated improved risk prediction for ventricular arrhythmias as compared to traditional biomarkers (i.e., left ventricular ejection fraction, LVEF), as validated retrospectively in large clinical cohorts, (e.g., Ly et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ML models have been utilized successfully and extensively in arrhythmia risk assessment (Feeny et al, 2020 ; Krittanawong et al, 2020 ) and in cardiovascular imaging, to diverse ends (Prakosa et al, 2013 ; Bernard et al, 2018 ; Sermesant et al, 2021 ). More recently, compound, explainable ML models have demonstrated improved risk prediction for ventricular arrhythmias as compared to traditional biomarkers (i.e., left ventricular ejection fraction, LVEF), as validated retrospectively in large clinical cohorts, (e.g., Ly et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have also successfully employed ML in arrhythmia risk stratification, including advanced ML-enabled image analysis (Feeny et al, 2020 ; Krittanawong et al, 2020 ; Trayanova, 2021 ). Recently, ML models have been combined with biophysical modeling to assess risk for dangerous arrhythmia as well as to uncover mechanisms of rhythm disturbances and to manage treatment for affected patients (Prakosa et al, 2013 ; Bernard et al, 2018 ; Lozoya et al, 2019 ; Shade et al, 2020 ; Banus et al, 2021 ; Monaci et al, 2021 ; Sermesant et al, 2021 ; Trayanova, 2021 ). Biophysical cardiac computational modeling and ML have also increasingly been combined to focus on drug-induced proarrhythmic risk assessment, as in e.g., Yang et al ( 2020 ) and Sahli-Costabal et al ( 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a growing interest in applications of artificial intelligence in cardiovascular diseases [ 4 , 9 , 10 , 11 ]. Emerging techniques, including machine learning (ML), and deep learning (DL), especially convolutional neural networks (CNN), have brought new insights into cardiovascular image segmentation [ 4 , 9 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 ] and could be applied to develop a fully automatic software. Synthetic data refer to data that are generated by a computer program, instead of being extracted from direct measurement by a human.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cardiac CT has been used to evaluate coronary stenosis, identify hemodynamically significant stenosis, elucidate the pathology in structural heart disease, and measure cardiac function [4][5][6][7]. Some excellent reviews on the application of AI in cardiovascular imaging have been published recently [3,[8][9][10][11]. Although these studies included cardiac CT, the subject of discussion was multimodality imaging, including echocardiography, nuclear imaging, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these studies included cardiac CT, the subject of discussion was multimodality imaging, including echocardiography, nuclear imaging, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). These studies also addressed how clinicians could apply AI in the clinical workflow with multimodality imaging, such as patient screening, decision support, prognostication, and follow-up [3,9,11]. Although these discussions are worthwhile, a more focused review of the CT imaging workflow is also meaningful from the perspective of the radiologist.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%