Operator Theory 2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-0348-0692-3_69-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applications of Hilbert Module Approach to Multivariable Operator Theory

Abstract: Abstract. A commuting n-tuple (T 1 , . . . , T n ) of bounded linear operators on a Hilbert space H associate a Hilbert module H over C[z 1 , . . . , z n ] in the following sense:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[XCGu03,P94,R88]) that no proper submodule is unitarily equivalent to the Bergman module itself. These issues are thoroughly discussed in [Sa14a]. (3) In a sense, the existence of a Hilbert module with unitarily equivalent submodules is a rare phenomenon.…”
Section: Further Results and Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[XCGu03,P94,R88]) that no proper submodule is unitarily equivalent to the Bergman module itself. These issues are thoroughly discussed in [Sa14a]. (3) In a sense, the existence of a Hilbert module with unitarily equivalent submodules is a rare phenomenon.…”
Section: Further Results and Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a (D) and S 1 ∼ = S 2 , then S 1 = S 2 (see [R88] or Corollary 8.5 in [Sa14a]). Therefore, on the one hand every non-zero submodule is isometrically isomorphic to the module itself while on the other hand, no proper submodule is.…”
Section: Unitarily Equivalent Submodulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. , M z d acting on H ca (T ) (refer to [23,Section 2] for the general theory of Hilbert modules over the algebra of polynomials). We refer to H ca (T ) as the Drury-Arveson-type Hilbert module associated with T .…”
Section: A Classification Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) If H = L 2 a (D) and S 1 ∼ = S 2 , then S 1 = S 2 (see [R88] or Corollary 8.5 in [Sa14a]). Therefore, on the one hand every non-zero submodule is isometrically isomorphic to the module itself while on the other hand, no proper submodule is.…”
Section: Unitarily Equivalent Submodulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[XCGu03, P94, R88]) that no proper submodule is unitarily equivalent to the Bergman module itself. These issues are thoroughly discussed in [Sa14a].…”
Section: Hilbert Modules Over A(d)mentioning
confidence: 99%