2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.patter.2022.100484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applications of knowledge graphs for food science and industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, a semantic resource includes a formalization of the knowledge of the biological and technological processes involved in food fermentation, thus bridging information from very different fields of chemical reactions determining the transformation of raw ingredients to food bioactives, enzymes involved in those reactions, and genes coding for those enzymes, as well as microbial genomes containing those genes, would further increase our ability to represent the real world. From the nutritional and computational standpoint, ontologies are the best and most appropriate instrument for this purpose, as they can categorize and make this information searchable in a coherent way [40]. Indeed, food ontologies are acquiring a central role in human nutrition, allowing us to formally describe the multi-faceted nature of the nutritional domain [41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, a semantic resource includes a formalization of the knowledge of the biological and technological processes involved in food fermentation, thus bridging information from very different fields of chemical reactions determining the transformation of raw ingredients to food bioactives, enzymes involved in those reactions, and genes coding for those enzymes, as well as microbial genomes containing those genes, would further increase our ability to represent the real world. From the nutritional and computational standpoint, ontologies are the best and most appropriate instrument for this purpose, as they can categorize and make this information searchable in a coherent way [40]. Indeed, food ontologies are acquiring a central role in human nutrition, allowing us to formally describe the multi-faceted nature of the nutritional domain [41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only the first page (containing 10 research results) of the Google search platform was considered. In the case of "Food Ontologies" and "Food Knowledge Graphs", we used the most recent review published by Weiqing et al [23] to identify the research papers related to "Food Ontologies" and "Food Knowledge Graphs". Once retrieved, we choose some of these papers to identify elements that are comparable.…”
Section: Step 1: Knowledge Elicitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we did with epidemiological surveillance systems, knowledge that was identified from the papers downloaded and saved in transcript was reviewed and analyzed in order to identify classes, properties and relations. We used the comparison of "Food Ontologies" and "Food Knowledge Graphs" provided by Weiqing et al [23] to find additional properties. These tables were imported in the ORKG system 89 .…”
Section: Step 2: Knowledge Analysis and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The construction procedure of KG mainly consists of knowledge extraction, knowledge fusion, knowledge storage, knowledge representation, knowledge verification, and knowledge reasoning. A standard KG can be acquired by the way of bottom-up or top-down, as illustrated in Figure 1 (Pu et al, 2021;Min et al, 2022). Bottom-up KG is constructed by knowledge extraction, knowledge fusion, knowledge storage, knowledge representation, knowledge verification, and knowledge reasoning, while the construction of top-down KG undertakes two critical steps, i.e., ontology learning and entity learning.…”
Section: General Process Of Knowledge Graph Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%