2016
DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/28/39/393001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applications of large-scale density functional theory in biology

Abstract: Abstract. Density functional theory (DFT) has become a routine tool for the computation of electronic structure in the physics, materials and chemistry fields. Yet the application of traditional DFT to problems in the biological sciences is hindered, to a large extent, by the unfavourable scaling of the computational effort with system size. Here, we review some of the major software and functionality advances that enable insightful electronic structure calculations to be performed on systems comprising many t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
76
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 312 publications
(505 reference statements)
0
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First of all, the computational cost involved necessarily requires new numerical strategies in order to go beyond model systems and extremely short time-scales. In the last years, a large activity has been focused on improving the scaling of the QM calculations, 78,[130][131][132] also by introducing novel semiempirical methods 133 including Density Functional tight binding. 134 However, also the classical models have to be reconsidered in terms of their scaling as, when coupled to fast QM methods, they can become the real bottleneck of the calculation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First of all, the computational cost involved necessarily requires new numerical strategies in order to go beyond model systems and extremely short time-scales. In the last years, a large activity has been focused on improving the scaling of the QM calculations, 78,[130][131][132] also by introducing novel semiempirical methods 133 including Density Functional tight binding. 134 However, also the classical models have to be reconsidered in terms of their scaling as, when coupled to fast QM methods, they can become the real bottleneck of the calculation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The set of function Ω jβ is effectively defined by the density matrix range, and the need for jβ to overlap with atoms lν, which naturally control the number of functions entering in the sums of Eqs. (12) and (14). Note that the calculation time can be reduced by imposing a range condition (R X ) on the exchange matrix.…”
Section: E Exact Exchangementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Formally, the excitation energies are determined by solving the electronic Schrödinger equation for each chromophore molecule in the protein, but in the absence of the other chromophore molecules [10,31,53,54,61]. Both the excitation energies and coupling elements can be calculated using ab initio electronic structure methods [10,53,61,72] although the large scale of such calculations for PPCs demands high-performance computing strategies, such as linear-scaling methods [72] or GPU-enabled approaches [61]. Instead, a more common route to determining the parameters of the electronic sub-system Hamiltonian is to use an approach such as the dipole-dipole approximation [35,54], derived by assuming that the transition densities can be treated within a point approximation.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%