1994
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9496(1994)120:3(350)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applications of Optimal Hydraulic Control to Ground‐Water Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
35
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…#!/bin/csh -f ################################################################ # the following arguments are called for from script in APPSPACK # argv [1] = input file name # argv [2] = output file name # argv [3] = tag # argv [4] = message (yes or no) # argv [5] = fidelity # argv [6] = number of variables # argv [7..n] = tag name for each variable ################################################################…”
Section: Begin Run Mfo Scriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…#!/bin/csh -f ################################################################ # the following arguments are called for from script in APPSPACK # argv [1] = input file name # argv [2] = output file name # argv [3] = tag # argv [4] = message (yes or no) # argv [5] = fidelity # argv [6] = number of variables # argv [7..n] = tag name for each variable ################################################################…”
Section: Begin Run Mfo Scriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cp -r templatedir workdir.$num mv $argv [1] workdir.$num/dakota_vars cd workdir.$num # run a different executable if least squares option is passed # into this script (argv [3] == "ls") set executable = APPSfbhc if (($#argv > 2) && ($argv [3] == "ls")) \\ set executable = APPSfbhc_ls [2] # NOTE: moving $argv [2] at the end of the script avoids any # problems with read race conditions # (although master-slave does not have this problem). mv $argv [2] ../.…”
Section: Begin Low Fi Scriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large-scale constrained nonlinear optimization [Gill et al, 2002] is used to find optimal management strategies within the constraints of the physical and agricultural systems represented by the integrated simulation models. Simulation-optimization methods have been used extensively in groundwater management [e.g., Gorelick, 1983;Yeh, 1992;Ahlfeld and Heidari, 1994;Wagner, 1995;Bredehoeft et al, 1995;Freeze and Gorelick, 1999;Feyen and Gorelick, 2004] and in conjunctive use [e.g., Bredehoeft and Young, 1983;Matsukawa et al, 1992;Reichard, 1995;Rao et al, 2004;Vedula et al, 2005]. This paper builds on these previous simulation-optimization studies, and features three particular strengths: (1) A complex spatially distributed groundwater model is directly incorporated into the optimization procedure, (2) an efficient methodology is used for solving the resulting CPUintensive problem, i.e., using analytical Jacobians and a sequential solution procedure, and (3) the resulting integrated water management model is applied to a large-scale realworld problem in a developing country, generating insights that are also relevant to other irrigated systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this particularly difficult kind of problem, discrete optimization algorithms, such as dynamic programming, branch and bound, local search, and evolutionary algorithms (e.g., genetic algorithms), have been applied successfully. For sites in which complex hydrogeological conditions obscure an obvious intuitive design, simulation-optimization techniques help decision makers in shedding light over alternate feasible options (Ahlfeld and Heidari 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%