2002
DOI: 10.1007/s002850100132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applications of Perron-Frobenius theory to population dynamics

Abstract: By the use of Perron-Frobenius theory, simple proofs are given of the Fundamental Theorem of Demography and of a theorem of Cushing and Yicang on the net reproductive rate occurring in matrix models of population dynamics. The latter result, which is closely related to the Stein-Rosenberg theorem in numerical linear algebra, is further refined with some additional nonnegative matrix theory. When the fertility matrix is scaled by the net reproductive rate, the growth rate of the model is $1$. More generally, we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
93
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we restrict ourselves to constant matrices, i.e., focus on projection rather than prediction (Caswell, 2001, p. 30). The basic reproduction ratio is now defined as (Cushing and Yicang, 1994;Caswell, 2001;Diekmann et al, 1990;Li and Schneider, 2002). Here ρ denotes the spectral radius (the largest modulus of all eigenvalues), I the identity matrix and the exponent −1 matrix inversion.…”
Section: Model and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Here, we restrict ourselves to constant matrices, i.e., focus on projection rather than prediction (Caswell, 2001, p. 30). The basic reproduction ratio is now defined as (Cushing and Yicang, 1994;Caswell, 2001;Diekmann et al, 1990;Li and Schneider, 2002). Here ρ denotes the spectral radius (the largest modulus of all eigenvalues), I the identity matrix and the exponent −1 matrix inversion.…”
Section: Model and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here ρ denotes the spectral radius (the largest modulus of all eigenvalues), I the identity matrix and the exponent −1 matrix inversion. The matrix G = [g lk ] = F(I−S) −1 is sometimes called fundamental matrix (Caswell, 2001) or next-generation matrix (Diekmann et al, 1990;Li and Schneider, 2002). Each entry g lk gives the expected number of offspring in birth state l that are born over its life time to an individual that was itself born in birth state k. Thus, the matrix G has as many rows with non-zero entries as there are birth states.…”
Section: Model and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Susceptible humans in patch k spend a proportion P ki of their time in patch i. Once the human resident of patch k is infected by the mosquito, it can in turn infect a susceptible mosquito that is visiting patch k, but resides in patch j. Mosquito residents of patch j, spend a proportion Q jk of their time in patch k. Now summing over all possible patches k, shows that the original infected mosquito in patch i can cause a secondary mosquito infection in patch j, provided that the expression in (22), which represents the (j, i)th entry of the product QP , is positive, as claimed. Irreducibility of the matrix QP therefore means that a single infected mosquito resident in any patch, has the potential to cause a mosquito infection in any other patch later on, although the latter infection is no longer necessarily a secondary infection, but may occur through a finite number of consecutive mosquito-human-mosquito infections as described above.…”
Section: First What Does Irreducibility Of P Q and Qp Mean?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also appears in life history theory (Metz et al 1992;Mylius and Diekmann 1995), age-or stage-structured population dynamics (Caswell 2001), and invasion biology (de Camino-Beck and Lewis 2007). In all cases, if R 0 >1 a small population will establish/persist but if R 0 <1 then individuals cannot on average replace themselves and the population declines to extinction (Cushing and Zhou 1994;Li and Schneider 2002). Note that R 0 theory is different and more general than R* theory, which predicts competitive exclusion based on minimal resource requirements (Tilman 1982), but which breaks down under dispersal (Abrams and Wilson 2004) and is limited to models of resource competition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%