2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2005.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applications of polydisperse sedimentation models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is basically this global stability property for which the MLB model (or equivalent models that are possibly termed differently) has become the model of choice in applications of polydisperse sedimentation [24,33,62,71,99,100]. This model gives rise to system of firstorder conservation laws.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is basically this global stability property for which the MLB model (or equivalent models that are possibly termed differently) has become the model of choice in applications of polydisperse sedimentation [24,33,62,71,99,100]. This model gives rise to system of firstorder conservation laws.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…On the other hand, in [10] it is explicitly proved that for N ¼ 2, the model based on (1.12) is hyperbolic; it is, however, unclear whether such a result holds for general N. An extensive discussion of hindered-settling functions for monodisperse and bidisperse suspensions and a verification by means of direct numerical simulation of polydisperse systems, including the formulas by Batchelor (1.10) and Davis and Gecol (1.11), is given by Cunha et al [66]. Batchelor's approach (1.10) is also discussed in [71]; as is argued in that paper, any extension of Batchelor's work to higher concentrations is strictly empirical. Moreover, since these models do not permit to obtain a hyperbolicity result that is general with respect to N and the particle sizes involved, they will not be selected for study herein.…”
Section: Limitations and Alternate Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Also, the coagulation due to differential settling can be ignored due to the relatively low settling velocities resulting by the low densities of the flocs. The settling velocity hindering is insignificant for these levels of solids volume fraction as it can be shown by employing the corresponding theories [17]. Moreover, Lyn et al [13], based on model observations, concluded that for conditions of relatively small particles concentrations in sedimentation tanks, the flocs coalescence do not affect the flow field and the effects on the concentration field and the removal efficiency may be of secondary importance.…”
Section: Flow Solvermentioning
confidence: 94%
“…To be mentioned are, among others, sedimentation of particles with two or more different sizes [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] and the associated experiments [24,30,31]; sedimentation and centrifugation of flocculated suspensions [32][33][34][35]; accounting for consolidation processes [36,37] with associated experiments [38,39]; and accounting for the flow of suspension into the vessel and out from it (e.g., thickeners under start-up conditions) [40]. With regard to the aim of the present analysis, as described below, it may be of interest to note that wall effects, like the Boycott effect as well as deposition of particles at the sidewalls or gliding of particles along the sidewalls, are not taken into account in the one-dimensional, unified analysis of batch and continuous thickening in vessels with varying cross section given in [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%