2000
DOI: 10.1016/s1093-3263(00)80090-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applications of random sampling to virtual screening of combinatorial libraries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible to compare these results with the work of Beroza et al and their Lockdown approach. They have optimized a 9 × 461 × 2285 × 1372 Ugi library and needed only 185 000 property evaluations of products.…”
Section: Partitioning Techniquementioning
confidence: 84%
“…It is possible to compare these results with the work of Beroza et al and their Lockdown approach. They have optimized a 9 × 461 × 2285 × 1372 Ugi library and needed only 185 000 property evaluations of products.…”
Section: Partitioning Techniquementioning
confidence: 84%
“…Focused libraries are enriched for a desired target and are more amenable to chemical synthesis, purification, analysis, and finally assaying to verify the efficacy of the focusing process [88]. The rational selection of compounds for these libraries leads to efficiency and economy in the screening process as compared to the random nature of HTS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hypotheses were then ranked based on their ability to discriminate between actives and inactives across the entire data set. The ranking criterion used was 'information content', [12] a function of both the active and inactive compounds. The top 100 pharmacophores were used to analyze virtual chemical libraries and to select compounds for the next round of synthesis and screening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%