2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2014.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applications of schedule-induced polydipsia in rodents for the study of an excessive ethanol intake phenotype

Abstract: Schedule-induced polydipsia (SIP) is generated by subjecting a highly motivated animal to a sub-optimal rate of food reinforcement while also providing access to a fluid. SIP is one of several adjunctive (or displacement) behaviors that are expressed in an exaggerated form that is deemed ‘excessive’. This feature makes SIP an attractive model for studying an excessive ethanol drinking phenotype in rodents. Multiple experimental variables are crucial for the full manifestation of adjunctive drinking, including … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
(167 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to get a rodent to consume sufficient amounts of ethanol, experimental manipulations are required. These experimental/environmental manipulations include fluid deprivation (Sandi et al, 1990), schedule-induced polydipsia (Ford, 2014; Meisch, 1975, 2001), scheduled availability (Holloway et al, 1984) including intermittent every-other-day access (Carnicella et al, 2014), sucrose-fading (Samson, 1986), and/or forced induction of dependence (Deutsch and Eisner, 1977); which can be achieved intragastrically (Crews, 2008; French, 2001), intraperitoneally (Pascual et al, 2009, 2014), by ethanol-vapor exposure (Roberts et al, 2000; Vendruscolo and Roberts, 2014), chronic drinking of a liquid ethanol diet (Brown et al, 2004; Lieber and DeCarli, 1989), or long-term drinking with water and food concurrently available (Vengeliene et al, 2009). Most of these methods include an integral stress factor, which does have some face validity with the clinical condition (Al’Absi, 2007).…”
Section: Background From An Animal Model Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to get a rodent to consume sufficient amounts of ethanol, experimental manipulations are required. These experimental/environmental manipulations include fluid deprivation (Sandi et al, 1990), schedule-induced polydipsia (Ford, 2014; Meisch, 1975, 2001), scheduled availability (Holloway et al, 1984) including intermittent every-other-day access (Carnicella et al, 2014), sucrose-fading (Samson, 1986), and/or forced induction of dependence (Deutsch and Eisner, 1977); which can be achieved intragastrically (Crews, 2008; French, 2001), intraperitoneally (Pascual et al, 2009, 2014), by ethanol-vapor exposure (Roberts et al, 2000; Vendruscolo and Roberts, 2014), chronic drinking of a liquid ethanol diet (Brown et al, 2004; Lieber and DeCarli, 1989), or long-term drinking with water and food concurrently available (Vengeliene et al, 2009). Most of these methods include an integral stress factor, which does have some face validity with the clinical condition (Al’Absi, 2007).…”
Section: Background From An Animal Model Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was predicted that the negative incentive shift would provoke more drinking than the other transitions and that there would be marked increases in fluid consumption when tap water was replaced with the sucrose solution. Additionally, of some interest was to determine if negative incentive shifts produce schedule-induced polydipsia (SIP), the classic example of adjunctive behavior (for a review, see Ford, 2014). If the transitions produce polydipsia, excessive drinking without a biological need, we would expect consumption to exceed three times the amount that would be consumed in the absence of testing, as has been demonstrated with SIP (Falk, 1961(Falk, , 1966(Falk, , 1969(Falk, , 1971Falk & Tang, 1988).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we report our first steps to create a model of adolescent voluntary EtOH intake that produces binge‐like BEC levels in outbred Sprague Dawley rats after a short daily limited access period. Our initial strategy was to assess adolescent EtOH intake using schedule‐induced polydipsia (SIP) (Falk, , ), a procedure that has been used to induce excessive alcohol intake in food deprived adult rodents by providing continuous EtOH access during sessions where food access is provided only intermittently (for review, see Ford, ). For instance, using moderate food deprivation and scheduled delivery of small food pellets along with unlimited session access first to water and then increasing concentrations of EtOH over multiple weeks, Falk and colleagues () ultimately produced BECs averaging 100 mg/dl in adult rats, with peak BECs in the 150 to 300 mg/dl range.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, using moderate food deprivation and scheduled delivery of small food pellets along with unlimited session access first to water and then increasing concentrations of EtOH over multiple weeks, Falk and colleagues () ultimately produced BECs averaging 100 mg/dl in adult rats, with peak BECs in the 150 to 300 mg/dl range. Despite recent renewed interest in SIP as a model of excessive alcohol consumption (see Ford, ; Ford et al., , ; Moreno and Flores, ), this means for induction of high alcohol consumption has received little, if any, exploration in adolescent animals. Although adolescence is a notably shorter period than the amount of time used to implement SIP by Falk and colleagues (), our goal was to modify the SIP procedure by providing EtOH in a highly palatable vehicle solution in an attempt to induce high adolescent EtOH intakes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%