1976
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(76)90333-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applications of the Karapandzic principle of lip reconstruction after excision of lip cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
1
2

Year Published

1977
1977
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
15
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The numbers are small when compared with subtotal or partial defects, in which the treatment is different and easier. The cases presented contradict the accepted dogma that reconstruction of the muscular layer of the lip is mandatory for normal function and appearance [2,7,8,16,17,18]. In our patients the majority of lips (7/10) were reconstructed without any muscle tissue.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The numbers are small when compared with subtotal or partial defects, in which the treatment is different and easier. The cases presented contradict the accepted dogma that reconstruction of the muscular layer of the lip is mandatory for normal function and appearance [2,7,8,16,17,18]. In our patients the majority of lips (7/10) were reconstructed without any muscle tissue.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…The use of full-thickness nasolabial tissue may denervate the upper lip muscle to a great degree [2,3]. Moreover, the innervation of musculocutaneous flaps is naturally deficient [6,7,11], whereas the almost inevitable excessive tension narrowing of the oral fissure and lip retrusion are unacceptable [2,3,8,9]. In addition, the problem of reconstructed lip flattening is seen in other procedures based on similar principles, especially to the fortunately abandoned Dieffenbach [4] method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microstomia always results but rarely causes significant problems: Properly speaking and nondrooling patients rarely complain of microstomia. 24 The long-term results show some evidence of surgical intervention, and Jackson 5 recommended this technique particularly for subtotal (up to three quarters) reconstruction of the lower lip.…”
Section: Rotation Flap Using the Residual Lipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These supporting muscles of the lips are combined into 1 unit to modulate and fine tune orbicularis oris position. 21 The buccinator is the primary muscle of the cheek. The buccinator compresses the cheek and assists in mastication.…”
Section: Arch Facial Plast Surg 2005;7:347-352mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jabaley and colleagues 21 described their experiences with the Karapandzic flap. 21 The primary shortcomings of the Karapandzic flap in their experience included underprojection of the lower lip, tightness of the lower lip, and microstomia that is invariably seen with this flap. Total lip defects and defects larger than 80% of lip length would be candidates for reconstruction via larger composite flaps, cheek flaps, or possible free-tissue transfer flaps.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%