1990
DOI: 10.2307/1164825
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applied Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
133
0
13

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 203 publications
(223 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
133
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…The correlation matrix in table 1 clearly demonstrated insignificant to low correlation (the remaining were omitted because of very low values). An exception moderate negative correlation existed between both hardness and dissolution of Pseudoephedrine Hydrochloride (Witz et al, 1990). This brought the focus into hardness first for analysis using SPC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correlation matrix in table 1 clearly demonstrated insignificant to low correlation (the remaining were omitted because of very low values). An exception moderate negative correlation existed between both hardness and dissolution of Pseudoephedrine Hydrochloride (Witz et al, 1990). This brought the focus into hardness first for analysis using SPC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The introductory analysis of the relationships between perceived odors and socio-demographic characteristics of inhabitants was based on rank-order Spearman correlation coefficients. The strength of correlation was interpreted according to the following scheme [59]: |r| ≥ 0.9-very strong correlation, 0.7 ≤ |r| < 0.9-strong correlation, 0.5 ≤ |r| < 0.7-medium strong correlation, 0.3 ≤ |r| < 0.5-weak correlation, |r| < 0.3-very weak correlation (negligible). An analysis of correspondence was performed in order to obtain a bi-plot presenting the correlation among variables.…”
Section: Data Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The percentage of agreement was calculated by the fraction of the number of ratings in agreement with the total number of ratings (i.e., agreements + disagreements). A percentage of agreement above 90% is required to consider as a "high agreement" [13].…”
Section: Inter-rater Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%