2021
DOI: 10.1201/9781003173205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applied Strength of Materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where Q is the flow rate (0.5 × 10 9 m 3 yr −1 or 15.9 m 3 s −1 ), L is pipe length (880 km or 880,000 m), C is the roughness factor, and D is the pipe diameter. We assume a smooth pipe with a roughness value C of 140 (Mott and Untener 2015). We generously assume a 3.0 m diameter pipe, which seems to be the practical limit of largediameter pipelines and a reasonable size for conveying the assumed flow without excessive head loss due to velocity (about 2.2 m s −1 for our assumptions).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where Q is the flow rate (0.5 × 10 9 m 3 yr −1 or 15.9 m 3 s −1 ), L is pipe length (880 km or 880,000 m), C is the roughness factor, and D is the pipe diameter. We assume a smooth pipe with a roughness value C of 140 (Mott and Untener 2015). We generously assume a 3.0 m diameter pipe, which seems to be the practical limit of largediameter pipelines and a reasonable size for conveying the assumed flow without excessive head loss due to velocity (about 2.2 m s −1 for our assumptions).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These assumptions result in a head loss of 795 m: We now calculate the total head required as the elevation difference, 1,280 m, plus the head loss of 795 m, to estimate the total head as 2,075 m. Figure 3 shows a hydraulic profile of these results. Next we estimate the power required to increase the head of water by 2,075 m. We use the equation for pump power P P (Mott and Untener 2015):…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) What ASTM four point bending procedures were followed in this lab? 3 Problems inherent to the FPB experiment's historical data acquisition and analysis were minor but numerous. Examples include signal noise in the X-Y recorders, shifting of the graph paper between test runs, data distortion through photocopying, low resolution when reading data from the graph (from pen width and scaling), and the opportunity for human error in the reading and transcription of all data values.…”
Section: Historical Data Acquisition and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the lecture setting, FPB theory is developed from free-body diagram through beam deflection. Theory is reinforced by analytical practice solving related homework problems [1][2][3] . The corresponding FPB laboratory has afforded students the opportunity to experimentally and analytically verify and validate beam flexure theory 3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation