2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.11.23.468853
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applied tutorial for the design and fabrication of biomicrofluidic devices by resin 3D printing

Abstract: Stereolithographic (SL) 3D printing, especially digital light processing (DLP) printing, is a promising rapid fabrication method for bio-microfluidic applications such as clinical tests, lab-on-a-chip devices, and sensor integrated devices. The benefits of 3D printing lead many to believe this fabrication method will accelerate the use of bioanalytical microfluidics, but there are major obstacles to overcome to fully utilize this technology. For commercially available printing materials, this includes challeng… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 62 publications
(80 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we evaluated this coating for biomicrofluidic device fabrication by testing the cytocompatibility, material properties, and optical properties of coated versus uncoated resin 3D prints of varied geometry. 3D-printed wells (Figure 2a) and microchannel chips with raised port inlets (Figure 2b) 23 were used for evaluation of the cytocompatibility and material integrity, while 8 mm cubes (Figure 2c) were used to characterize the surface and optical properties. All prints were post-treated by washing with isopropyl alcohol and postcuring with UV light (details are provided in Protocol S1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we evaluated this coating for biomicrofluidic device fabrication by testing the cytocompatibility, material properties, and optical properties of coated versus uncoated resin 3D prints of varied geometry. 3D-printed wells (Figure 2a) and microchannel chips with raised port inlets (Figure 2b) 23 were used for evaluation of the cytocompatibility and material integrity, while 8 mm cubes (Figure 2c) were used to characterize the surface and optical properties. All prints were post-treated by washing with isopropyl alcohol and postcuring with UV light (details are provided in Protocol S1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%