2021
DOI: 10.3390/app11083335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Apply DEMATEL to Analyzing Key Barriers to Implementing the Circular Economy: An Application for the Textile Sector

Abstract: Continuous improvement and innovation are solid foundations for the textile sector to maintain excellent growth and active sustainability. As the limited resources possessed by textile companies generally result in the incapability of implementing circular economy (CE) strategies simultaneously, recently, researchers advocate that organizations should analyze the influential inter-relationship between key barriers to explore the more dominant determinants for designing improved actions for implementing CE in t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Binding economic performance, social inclusiveness, and environmental resilience [26], this new industrial paradigm promotes material flows systems in which resources are optimized, thus enabling "sustainability" covering a broader framing [23]. Indeed, by promoting the reduction of resources extraction, the extension of the product lifecycle, and the minimization of waste production [27,28], the transition to circular business models has the potential to decrease the environmental impact of the industry [2,6,9,29,30]. However, the review suggests that companies are selectively implementing circular actions in their supply chains, rather than disrupting the entire business model [9] and addressing the main environmental impacts of their activities [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Binding economic performance, social inclusiveness, and environmental resilience [26], this new industrial paradigm promotes material flows systems in which resources are optimized, thus enabling "sustainability" covering a broader framing [23]. Indeed, by promoting the reduction of resources extraction, the extension of the product lifecycle, and the minimization of waste production [27,28], the transition to circular business models has the potential to decrease the environmental impact of the industry [2,6,9,29,30]. However, the review suggests that companies are selectively implementing circular actions in their supply chains, rather than disrupting the entire business model [9] and addressing the main environmental impacts of their activities [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the review suggests that companies are selectively implementing circular actions in their supply chains, rather than disrupting the entire business model [9] and addressing the main environmental impacts of their activities [12]. In fact, by bridging production and consumption activities [12,15,25], "circular economy" involves the implementation of several strategies usually suggested through the "R framework" and requiring radical systemic changes in how products and materials are manufactured, used, and disposed of [29][30][31]. A varying level of detail exist in the literature [32] and up to "10R principles"can be found namely refuse, rethink, reduce, reuse, repair, refurbish, remanufacture, repurpose, recycle, and recover [27,32,33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several studies are focused on the identification of the main barriers to the design and implementation of successful CE strategies [15][16][17]. One of the most recognized limits for the overcoming of the CE practice-theory gap is the lack of clear and consistent methods to actually assess the circularity and sustainability of products, processes, business models, and strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%