2015
DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.115.019648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying a Big Data Approach to Biomarker Discovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From a scientific standpoint biomarker discovery should be ideally performed in relatively homogenous populations using narrowly defined endpoints that represent the most specific phenotypes possible. In contrast validation should be performed in diverse cohorts that better reflect the clinical circumstances in which biomarkers might be used [30].…”
Section: Study Design and The Biomarker Discovery Pipeline: Considmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From a scientific standpoint biomarker discovery should be ideally performed in relatively homogenous populations using narrowly defined endpoints that represent the most specific phenotypes possible. In contrast validation should be performed in diverse cohorts that better reflect the clinical circumstances in which biomarkers might be used [30].…”
Section: Study Design and The Biomarker Discovery Pipeline: Considmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for this lack of follow up could be because validation studies do not actually take place or because validation studies are carried out and produce negative results, which are not reported (or published). A recent systematic review examined biomarker discovery publications where metabolomics biomarkers had been validated on an external test set (usually by the same group, on the same publication) and showed that apparently equivalent studies, on the same disease, obtain different biomarker lists [30].…”
Section: The Data Analysis Step: Considerations For Complex Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The investigators and clinicians in the cardiovascular specialty have extensive experience with discovery science 18 , a robust array of RCT data 109 , a large number of longitudinal cohort studies, and are familiar with mobile technology and implanted medical devices that provide readouts of cardiovascular physiological data, often in real time 110,111 . In addition, cardiovascular investigators are accustomed to using biomarker assays for evaluating patients 112 , incorporating them to enhance the efficiency of clinical trials 67 , and are in a position to use such tests to define which individuals should receive molecularly targeted therapies in the future 113,114 . Basic and clinical cardiovascular investigators have published standards for merging electronic health record data and genomics for research purposes 115 .…”
Section: Precision Participant Descriptormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, no gold standard exists for what constitutes a good candidate (87). Decision justifications in published reports range from formal statistical inferences of individual proteins (88), panels of proteins after feature selection (89), to additional criteria, such as cutoffs in the raw magnitude of fold-change (e.g., >5-fold changes) in at least n number of patients (90), to more custom modeling that adjust for covariates in risk assessments (31,35).…”
Section: Interpretation and Validation Of Proteomics Datamentioning
confidence: 99%