Understanding Sexual Offending 2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-53301-4_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying a Criminal Career Approach to Expose Myths, Misconceptions, and Erroneous Conclusions About Sexual Offending

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The risk of sexual reoffending is dynamic in nature and varies over time and across contexts (Babchishin & Hanson, 2020; Lussier et al, 2020; Olver & Stockdale, 2020; Nitsche et al, 2022). The NBM-RSR assumes that risk of sexual reoffending:(A) Results from a self-sustaining network of causally interacting dynamic risk factors (van den Berg et al, 2020; van den Berg et al, 2022),(B) Is multifactorially determined through the construction of the network (i.e., the network topology; Borsboom et al, 2019).…”
Section: Network-based Model Of Risk Of Sexual Reoffending (Nbm-rsr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The risk of sexual reoffending is dynamic in nature and varies over time and across contexts (Babchishin & Hanson, 2020; Lussier et al, 2020; Olver & Stockdale, 2020; Nitsche et al, 2022). The NBM-RSR assumes that risk of sexual reoffending:(A) Results from a self-sustaining network of causally interacting dynamic risk factors (van den Berg et al, 2020; van den Berg et al, 2022),(B) Is multifactorially determined through the construction of the network (i.e., the network topology; Borsboom et al, 2019).…”
Section: Network-based Model Of Risk Of Sexual Reoffending (Nbm-rsr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Central to the Propensities Model are latent constructs, called propensities, which refer to relatively stable intra-individual features that influence an individual’s probability of sexual reoffending (Lussier et al, 2020; Prentky et al, 2015; Thornton, 2016). Despite their relative stability, propensities are considered to be amendable to change by treatment or risk management strategies (Mann et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, despite strong and repeated calls for closer connections between these parallel literatures, we see that desistance theories have only been sparingly integrated into the study of extremist disengagement, and that extremist offenders are rarely, if ever, included in desistance studies. In their recent book on sexual offending, Lussier et al (2020, p. 20) link “the relative lack of a criminological view of sex offending” to a couple of prevalent beliefs in criminology, which might help us explain why violent extremism has similarly been “in criminology’s blind spot” (Lussier et al, 2020, p. 3) for such a long time. One set of beliefs has to do with the “generality of deviance notion” (Giordano et al, 2015, p. 332).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most criminological theories, including those concerned with explaining desistance, are formulated with “generic crime” (Giordano et al, 2015, p. 333) in mind, rather than specific types of offending. From this perspective, theoretical explanations are meant to account for change across the board of offending behavior, rendering specific studies of desistance from violent extremism superfluous (Lussier et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation