2011
DOI: 10.1179/1754762811y.0000000010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying a subtraction technique to minimize cochlear implant artifact with soundfield and direct audio input stimulations

Abstract: We explored the feasibility of a subtraction technique described by Friesen and Picton to remove the cochlear implant (CI) artifact to long duration stimuli in the soundfield and using direct input all through the participant's preferred MAP. Friesen and Picton previously explored this technique by recording cortical potentials in four CI users with 1000 pulse per second (pps) stimuli, bypassing the speech processor. Cortical auditory evoked potentials (N1-P2) to 1000 Hz tones were recorded from a post-lingua… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14 Recently, some methods have been developed which promise to remove the artifact from single channel 15,16 and from multichannel cortical auditory evoked responses. 17,18 However, these methods only concentrate on cortical potentials (and not ABRs) and they are limited in the evaluation since they lack the actual (artifact free) responses for comparison. 14 Besides artifact removal in cortical potentials, there are subtraction techniques to obtain the small neural response from eABRs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Recently, some methods have been developed which promise to remove the artifact from single channel 15,16 and from multichannel cortical auditory evoked responses. 17,18 However, these methods only concentrate on cortical potentials (and not ABRs) and they are limited in the evaluation since they lack the actual (artifact free) responses for comparison. 14 Besides artifact removal in cortical potentials, there are subtraction techniques to obtain the small neural response from eABRs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%