2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2005.06.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying case-based reasoning for product configuration in mass customization environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
80
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are number of modelling techniques used for knowledge representation in configuration projects [10][11] [12]. For this project it was decided to use Product Variant Master (PVM) and class diagram associated with Class, Responsibility, and Collaboration Cards (CRC), which build on UML [13].…”
Section: B Knowledge Representation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are number of modelling techniques used for knowledge representation in configuration projects [10][11] [12]. For this project it was decided to use Product Variant Master (PVM) and class diagram associated with Class, Responsibility, and Collaboration Cards (CRC), which build on UML [13].…”
Section: B Knowledge Representation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This additional information has to be taken into account by the similarity function. A more detailed discussion of such functions can be found, for example, in Tseng, Chang, and Chang (2005).…”
Section: Recommending Feature Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples are the recommendation of features and feature values (Coester et al 2002, Tiihonen andFelfernig 2010), the recommendation of relaxations (Fel fer nig et al 2009), and the reuse of cases for the determination of new configurations (Tseng, Chang, and Chang 2005). The reuse of cases is and has been intensively investigated by the CBR community (Mantaras et al 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The argument that customisation falls within the framework of quality is reversed by MacCarthy et al (2003b) who identify quality as one of a wide range of product attributes that are customizable, such as functionality and aesthetics. An expanded list of the customizable attributes is presented in Table 1 and is offered also as a standardised terminology of feature customisation, something which is currently lacking in the MC literature (Tseng et al, 2005). In this paper these attributes are used to appraise the relevance of quality techniques.…”
Section: Mass Customisation In the Context Of Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%