2008
DOI: 10.1109/imcsit.2008.4747229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying emphasized soft targets for Gaussian Mixture Model based classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there are many forms of generating soft versions of decision targets, such as convolutional smoothing [21], it seems reasonable to keep the advantages that sample emphasis provides. This was the orientation of [22] and of our previous work [23], in which we showed the effectiveness of using an emphasized combination of the original targets and those provided by an auxiliary classifier when the architectures are the popular Multi-Layer Perceptrons (MLP), and [24], with preliminary results for Gaussian Mixture Models (GMM).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Although there are many forms of generating soft versions of decision targets, such as convolutional smoothing [21], it seems reasonable to keep the advantages that sample emphasis provides. This was the orientation of [22] and of our previous work [23], in which we showed the effectiveness of using an emphasized combination of the original targets and those provided by an auxiliary classifier when the architectures are the popular Multi-Layer Perceptrons (MLP), and [24], with preliminary results for Gaussian Mixture Models (GMM).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…I propose a solution based on an ensemble of Support Vector Machines (SVM) of the kind described in [5] [6], and on a voting mechanism based on the Gaussian Mixture Model described in [7]. Common approach based on ensemble of classifiers like boosting and bagging focus on preparing different training data set for each member of ensemble [8] [9].…”
Section: A Proposed Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%