2008 International Conference on Information and Automation 2008
DOI: 10.1109/icinfa.2008.4608123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying extreme learning machine to plant species identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, according to the idea of centered inputs in [18,19], HFSR in Eq. (8) can be equivalently realized by carrying out the corresponding HFSR for centered inputs.…”
Section: Centered-elmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, according to the idea of centered inputs in [18,19], HFSR in Eq. (8) can be equivalently realized by carrying out the corresponding HFSR for centered inputs.…”
Section: Centered-elmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to overcome these shortcomings of these learning algorithms, Huang et al proposed the extreme learning machine (ELM) for single hidden layer feedforward neural networks (SLFN) [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. They proved that the input weights and the hidden layer biases can be randomly assigned if the activation function in the hidden layer is infinitely differentiable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been a study of several methods for recognizing plants by studying their leaf texture, shape, color and venation. Some of the methods include Gabor Filters (GF), Fractal Dimensions (FracDim), Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM), Histogram of Oriented Gradient (HoG) for leaf texture; Casanova et al, 2009;Cope et al, 2010;Kebapci et al, 2011;Rossatto et al, 2011;Sá et al, 2013;Syahputra et al, 2014;Zhai and Du, 2008), Simple and Morphological Shape Descriptors (SMSD), Hu moments, Fourier Descriptor (FD), Tchebichef Moment Invariant (TMI), Centroid Contour Distance (CCD), Zernike Moment Invariant (ZMI), Harmonic mean projecting transform for leaf shape; (Aakif and Khan, 2015;Chaki et al, 2015b;Du et al, 2007;Hossain and Amin, 2010;Kadir et al, 2011b;Lee and Chen, 2006;Teng et al, 2009;Zahra et al, 2020), Color Moments (CM), Color Histograms (CH), Color Co-occurrence Matrices (CCM) for leaf color; (Caglayan et al, 2013;Che Hussin et al, 2013;Kebapci et al, 2011;Prasad et al, 2013;Yanikoglu et al, 2014). Areoles morphology, Leaf vein and Run-length features for leaf venation; (Gu et al, 2005;Larese et al, 2012;Larese et al, 2014a;2014b)…”
Section: Plant Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The researchers in the paper [89] used BPN to train herbs of 600 training samples and 1400 test samples with the texture feature and achieved an average accuracy of 98.9%. The authors of paper [131] accounted the single hidden layer feed forward network for classification. There is no need to use a kernel function to approximate the weights, given that it updates the weights randomly for fixed bias inputs.…”
Section: Fig 4 General Classification Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%