2017
DOI: 10.21201/2017.9965
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying Feminist Principles to Program Monitoring, Evaluation, Accountability and Learning

Abstract: Oxfam is committed to mainstreaming women's rights and to transforming unequal gender and power relations. For its programmes, this means that it needs to track its contributions to these changes. This paper aims to share reflections on how to apply feminist principles to monitoring, evaluation, accountability and learning (MEAL) practice. It includes case studies of Oxfam's experience of applying these principles to its programmes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Photography can also be understood as a dialogic process (Fairey & Orton, 2019). A further option for engaging service users/contributors in content generation is through the MEAL model (Monitoring, Evaluation, Accountability, Learning) (Wakefield & Koerppen, 2017).…”
Section: Co-creating Fundraising Frames With Service Users/contributorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Photography can also be understood as a dialogic process (Fairey & Orton, 2019). A further option for engaging service users/contributors in content generation is through the MEAL model (Monitoring, Evaluation, Accountability, Learning) (Wakefield & Koerppen, 2017).…”
Section: Co-creating Fundraising Frames With Service Users/contributorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a political take on this also recognizes that different actors in any situation will have varied ability and power to determine which forms of knowledge are likely to predominate. As such, as Wakefield and Koerppen (2017) and many other feminist scholars and practitioners note, MEL activities can both challenge and reinforce power relationships. This distinction and its implications are of particular relevance, given what has been described as the 'genderblind' nature of much political economy analysis and associated TWP programmes (Derbyshire et al, 2018).…”
Section: • • Different Stakeholders Have Different Views About What C...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our analysis in this paper is informed by a thematic analysis of the qualitative narratives from the proposals, surveys and follow up conversations. In reflecting on this qualitative data, JASS like other feminist organizations draws on a long scholarly and movement-based critique of outcome-based understanding of structural change that relies on linear before and after narratives of change to measure impact (see Brisolara et al, 2014 ; Sielbeck-Bowen et al, 2002 ; Wakefield & Koeppern, 2017 ). JASS understands the structural issues that movements respond to as complex, deep rooted and transforming these conditions requires multi-faceted, networked actions.…”
Section: The Jass Mobilisation Fund: Supporting Responses To Covid 19mentioning
confidence: 99%