1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0142-0615(96)00026-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying H∞ optimisation method to power system stabiliser design Part 1: Single-machine infinite-bus systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The response of the closed loop system due a 10% step change in mechanical torque is shown in Figure 5. The proposed design is compared to the conventional design presented in [15]. Remarkably, the proposed design ensures system stability at this test point while the conventional PSS fails.…”
Section: B Validation Based On Nonlinear Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The response of the closed loop system due a 10% step change in mechanical torque is shown in Figure 5. The proposed design is compared to the conventional design presented in [15]. Remarkably, the proposed design ensures system stability at this test point while the conventional PSS fails.…”
Section: B Validation Based On Nonlinear Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tuning guidelines and applications of PSS with various signals are thoroughly discussed in Larsen and Swann . The design and practical application of PSS on the Ontario Hydro station are given in Kundur et al Useful PSS design methods on the multi‐machine environment are presented in Huwer et al, Gupta et al, and Gomes et al A number of PSS design techniques like robust control techniques, sliding mode control techniques, fuzzy sliding mode control techniques, optimization methods using LQR, H ∞ techniques artificial intelligence techniques such as fuzzy logic and neuro‐fuzzy techniques, linear control techniques such as pole placement techniques, nonlinear control techniques such as feedback linearization and adaptive control techniques had been developed by various researchers from the last two decades. Though they performed well in stabilizing the system, design of PSS for the multi‐machine power system using conventional techniques under variable operating conditions is a complex process and hence consume much computational time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods such as pole placement [26] using state feedback require all the state variable information, whereas model uncertainties are presented as a linear fractional transformation in [27] and the controller is designed using a quadratic performance index resulting in a controller with the same order as the plant. Robust PSS design using H ∞ & μ synthesis are described in [28][29][30][31], although finding the weighting factor is an additional task in the H ∞ method. The LMI technique [32][33][34] locates all the closed loop poles in a pre-specified bound.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%