2004
DOI: 10.1088/1469-7688/4/2/009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying importance sampling for estimating coherent credit risk contributions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With respect to the simulation algorithm, we run a competing test of both Monte Carlo estimation methods, standard and proposed, as in Merino and Nyfeler (2004) and Glasserman and Li (2005), among others. The comparison consists of the following: Given a portfolio, 50 estimates of η are obtained by means of each simulation algorithm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With respect to the simulation algorithm, we run a competing test of both Monte Carlo estimation methods, standard and proposed, as in Merino and Nyfeler (2004) and Glasserman and Li (2005), among others. The comparison consists of the following: Given a portfolio, 50 estimates of η are obtained by means of each simulation algorithm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laeven and Goovaerts (2004) also consider conditional allocations, but their study does so with a different purpose, capital optimization, and does not integrate them to form an unconditional allocation vector. Merino and Nyfeler (2004) apply an importance sampling algorithm to the problem of calculating the ES allocation vector, which is different from defining a new allocation method that uses as input a vector derived from an efficient simulation algorithm for the aggregated capital, as happens with our approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inspired by that paper, and using results from Kang and Shahabuddin (2005) and Merino and Nyfeler (2004), I work out a three-stage IS algorithm for the hierarchical VCG model based on the exponential tilting of the systematic factors and conditional portfolio loss distribution.…”
Section: Importance Sampling Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Control variates are employed by Tchistiakov et al (2004) where the Vasicek distribution is considered as a control variable. Importance sampling (IS) is adopted by Kalkbrener et al (2004); Merino & Nyfeler (2005) for the calculation of Expected Shortfall Contribution and by Glasserman & Li (2005); Glasserman (2006) for the calculation of VaR and VaRC. We note that the difficulty with Monte Carlo simulation mainly concerns the determination of VaRC since the estimate expressed in formula (2) is based on the very rare event that portfolio loss L = VaR.…”
Section: Importance Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%