2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2019.10.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying landmarks to enhance memory-based collaborative filtering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen that the chosen preference similarity measure determines the accuracy of memory-based collaborative filtering. Some recent preference similarity measures for high accuracy are OS [14] and LM [34]. OS [14] combines Percentage of Non-Common Ratings (PNCR) and Absolute Percentage of Non-Common Ratings (PNCR) in a similarity measure as follows:…”
Section: Single-user Recommender Systems Using Memory-based Collaborative Filteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can be seen that the chosen preference similarity measure determines the accuracy of memory-based collaborative filtering. Some recent preference similarity measures for high accuracy are OS [14] and LM [34]. OS [14] combines Percentage of Non-Common Ratings (PNCR) and Absolute Percentage of Non-Common Ratings (PNCR) in a similarity measure as follows:…”
Section: Single-user Recommender Systems Using Memory-based Collaborative Filteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where and are the item that user and user have rated, respectively. LM [34] defines a landmark set to represent users instead of the item set. Landmarks are the users with the most observed ratings.…”
Section: Single-user Recommender Systems Using Memory-based Collaborative Filteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They differ in how to process the user‐item matrix. The model‐based algorithms (Khadem & Forghani, 2020; Lima et al, 2020) follow two steps: The algorithm handles several matrices to generate an efficient model for representing the original rating matrix. The generated model is then used to estimate the predictions of active user ratings. The most popular models for making recommendations include Bayesian classifiers (Gao et al, 2020), neural networks (Bandyopadhyay & Thakur, 2020), fuzzy systems (Barzanti et al, 2020), genetic algorithms (GAs) (Moses & Babu, 2020), latent features (Da'u et al, 2020), and matrix factorization (Liu & Ye, 2020). On the other hand, based on the steps outlined below, memory‐based algorithms (Mallik & Sahoo, 2020; Narayanan et al, 2020) use the entire rating matrix to achieve predictions: The prediction ratings of the active user are estimated from the ratings of their neighbours. The similarity metrics are used to measure the distance between two users or two items by their ratings. Memory‐based methods are divided into two main algorithms: User‐based algorithms, where the method for obtaining neighbours works based on the users. Item‐based algorithms, where neighbours are obtained based on the items. There are two main issues in RSs: cold start and sparsity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They differ in how to process the user-item matrix. The model-based algorithms (Khadem & Forghani, 2020;Lima et al, 2020) follow two steps:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, a number of techniques have been developed for memory-based systems, aiming to tackle the deficiencies presented above; these include distributed techniques [14] and optimization methods [15][16][17][18] to improve scalability, density enrichment [19] and coverage increase methods [20] to tackle sparsity, and a multitude of methods to improve rating prediction and recommendation quality [21][22][23][24][25]. Considering all the above, memory-based techniques are a viable approach for building contemporary and efficient recommender systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%