2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107386
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying machine learning to construct braking emission model for real-world road driving

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To figure out this difference, a specific survey was conducted to investigate the special properties of NEBCs by comparing them with the commonly used BC prepared with agricultural residues (ABC500 and ABC900). First, the Eli5 algorithm was implemented for inspecting black-box models . Hence, it was used to inspect an individual prediction of a model, calculating the importance index of the model input feature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To figure out this difference, a specific survey was conducted to investigate the special properties of NEBCs by comparing them with the commonly used BC prepared with agricultural residues (ABC500 and ABC900). First, the Eli5 algorithm was implemented for inspecting black-box models . Hence, it was used to inspect an individual prediction of a model, calculating the importance index of the model input feature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the Eli5 algorithm was implemented for inspecting black-box models. 43 algorithm, we can attempt to ascertain the reasoning behind the model's choice and which feature would work for the prediction. Figure 4d shows that the SSA represented the most contribution, followed by I D /I G , T°C, C%, Gra, O% and Oxi, which have played a positive role in the prediction results of FBC900.…”
Section: Data Collection and Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brake dust is typically produced as the result of mechanical action during breaking events, and a range of factors have been associated with instantaneous emission rates, including composition brake pads, design of braking mechanism, vehicle mass, brake temperature and driving conditions (see, e.g., [12,32,33]). NAEI methods provide initial estimates of EF brake of 53.6, 27.1 and 8.4 mg.km −1 for PM 10 on urban, rural and motorway routes, respectively, and 21.4, 10.8 and 3.4 mg.km −1 for PM 2.5 on urban, rural and motorway routes, respectively [34].…”
Section: Brake Particulate Emission Factors Ef Brakementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equation ( 6) assumes a strong association between EFs and speed at an aggregated level, i.e., speeds averaged across several minutes or kilometers. Elsewhere, researchers have identified other statistical measures of driving as better proxies for EF brake , e.g., the US EPA used acceleration ≤−2 miles.h −1 .s −1 or vehicle specific power (VSP) ≤−4 kW.tonne −1 in their motor vehicle emission simulator (MOVES) model [44], and Wei et al [32] identified brake energy intensity (BEI) in their more recent machine learning study. Alternative EF tyre parameters are less commonly cited although elevated emissions are associated with a range of driving activities, including both acceleration and braking [45].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to complex deep learning models, using four ensemble models made it easier to capture the variation in parameters and variable interpretation within each model. For the ensemble learning component, the RF was a typical bagging algorithm that accomplished a classification task by voting and a regression task by averaging [43]. Specifically, the RF was a set of decision trees, and each tree was constructed using the best split for each node among a subset of predictors randomly chosen at that node.…”
Section: Model Building and Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%