2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-02351-4_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying Model Transformations to Optimizing Real-Time QoS Configurations in DRE Systems

Abstract: Abstract. The quality of a software architecture for component 1 -based distributed systems is defined not just by its source code but also by other systemic artifacts, such as the assembly, deployment, and configuration of the application components and their component middleware. In the context of distributed, real-time, and embedded (DRE) component-based systems, bin packing algorithms and schedulability analysis have been used to make deployment and configuration decisions. However, these algorithms make o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our approach, however, architectural anti-pattern can be identified as side effect. In the context of distributed systems a rule based ap-proach for configuration optimization, according to QoS metrics, has been proposed in [49]. In [50] is proposed an approach that comprises a trade-off analysis of competing Non-Functional Requirements (NFR) in order to find critical components for one or 685 more NFR.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our approach, however, architectural anti-pattern can be identified as side effect. In the context of distributed systems a rule based ap-proach for configuration optimization, according to QoS metrics, has been proposed in [49]. In [50] is proposed an approach that comprises a trade-off analysis of competing Non-Functional Requirements (NFR) in order to find critical components for one or 685 more NFR.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14]) encapsulate general knowledge on how to improve system performance into executable rules; (ii) design space exploration approaches (e.g. [32]) explore the design space by examining alternatives that can cope with performance flaws; (iii) metaheuristic approaches (e.g.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Services are assumed to have fixed performance metrics that do not change for changing composition. Only service selection is considered as a degree of freedom, and trade-offs with other quality criteria are not considered Kavimandan et al [24] presents an approach to optimise component allocation in the context of distributed real-time embedded component-based systems. They enhance preexisting bin packing algorithms with the consideration of component consideration and deploy components together that have a compatible configuration.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%