Applying Multiple Data Collection Tools to Quantify Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Communication on Twitter

Abstract

BackgroundHuman papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted infection in the United States. There are several vaccines that protect against strains of HPV most associated with cervical and other cancers. Thus, HPV vaccination has become an important component of adolescent preventive health care. As media evolves, more information about HPV vaccination is shifting to social media platforms such as Twitter. Health information consumed on social media may be especially influential for segments of society such as younger populations, as well as ethnic and racial minorities.ObjectiveThe objectives of our study were to quantify HPV vaccine communication on Twitter, and to develop a novel methodology to improve the collection and analysis of Twitter data.MethodsWe collected Twitter data using 10 keywords related to HPV vaccination from August 1, 2014 to July 31, 2015. Prospective data collection used the Twitter Search API and retrospective data collection used Twitter Firehose. Using a codebook to characterize tweet sentiment and content, we coded a subsample of tweets by hand to develop classification models to code the entire sample using machine learning procedures. We also documented the words in the 140-character tweet text most associated with each keyword. We used chi-square tests, analysis of variance, and nonparametric equality of medians to test for significant differences in tweet characteristic by sentiment.ResultsA total of 193,379 English-language tweets were collected, classified, and analyzed. Associated words varied with each keyword, with more positive and preventive words associated with “HPV vaccine” and more negative words associated with name-brand vaccines. Positive sentiment was the largest type of sentiment in the sample, with 75,393 positive tweets (38.99% of the sample), followed by negative sentiment with 48,940 tweets (25.31% of the sample). Positive and neutral tweets constituted the largest percentage of tweets mentioning prevention or protection (20,425/75,393, 27.09% and 6477/25,110, 25.79%, respectively), compared with only 11.5% of negative tweets (5647/48,940; P<.001). Nearly one-half (22,726/48,940, 46.44%) of negative tweets mentioned side effects, compared with only 17.14% (12,921/75,393) of positive tweets and 15.08% of neutral tweets (3787/25,110; P<.001).ConclusionsExamining social media to detect health trends, as well as to communicate important health information, is a growing area of research in public health. Understanding the content and implications of conversations that form around HPV vaccination on social media can aid health organizations and health-focused Twitter users in creating a meaningful exchange of ideas and in having a significant impact on vaccine uptake. This area of research is inherently interdisciplinary, and this study supports this movement by applying public health, health communication, and data science approaches to extend methodologies across fields.

Chinese Public Attention to COVID-19 Epidemic: Based on Social Media

“…On the whole, negative emotions weakened, and positive emotions increased. Previous studies have pointed out that there is also an important relationship between emotions and content on social media 53 . The content analysis of social networks can identify people's attitudes or reactions to specific health hazard events 30,39 .…”

What Drives Health Professionals to Tweet About #HPVvaccine? Identifying Strategies for Effective Communication

“…Classifiers used in this study, along with the corresponding accuracy as measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), included the following: type of user (AUC = 0.75), target audience (AUC = 0.95), vaccine sentiment (AUC = 0.92), content (AUC = 0.72), side effects (AUC = 0.74), prevention/protection (AUC = 0.77), risk/prevalence (AUC = 0.88), men/boys (AUC = 0.92), and women/girls (AUC = 0.92). Our full methods and classification process are described elsewhere (22). …”

Secondary Use of Recorded or Self-expressed Personal Data: Consumer Health Informatics and Education in the Era of Social Media and Health Apps

“…They also expect the use of social media to be implemented in institutions that have developed a digital relationship with their patients and other interested parties, such as family members. Other authors have used similar approaches to better understand barriers to treatment [10], side effects of drugs [9], and vaccine hesitancy [11]. The selected best papers in this group are:…”

“…From a patient point of view, secondary use of health data consists in using personal health information (PHI) outside the direct health care delivery process [2]. To populate this section, we merged this original definition with the use of data the patient expresses about him/herself when using social media tools for varied purposes such as, for instance, healthcare delivery experience [3], medication use, abuse, or misuse [4,5,6], e-cigarette experience [7], emotions, sentiments and feelings [8,9], experience with a specific disease [10] or a public health recommendation [11], or daily health behaviours [12]. These data are not natively part of any personal health record, but may be voluntarily delivered by the patient to public and anonymous recipients.…”