2003
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-002-1693-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying non-parametric statistical methods to the classical measurements of inclusion complex binding constants

Abstract: A study on using non-parametric statistical methods was carried out to calculate the binding constant of an inclusion complex and to estimate its associated uncertainty. First, a correct evaluation of the stoichiometry was carried out in order to ensure an accurate determination of the binding constant. For this purpose, the modified Benesi-Hildelbrand method had been previously applied. Then, four statistical methods (three non-parametric methods: two bootstrap approaches, the jackknife method and a parametri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Independent evidence of the formation of discrete 1:1 inclusion complexes is provided by isothermal UV-Vis, NMR, and calorimetric titrations for 2,4-D and 2,4-DCP with β-CD [49,50,51]. The 1:1 binding constants were estimated in aqueous solution at variable pH conditions relative to this sorption study ( cf .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Independent evidence of the formation of discrete 1:1 inclusion complexes is provided by isothermal UV-Vis, NMR, and calorimetric titrations for 2,4-D and 2,4-DCP with β-CD [49,50,51]. The 1:1 binding constants were estimated in aqueous solution at variable pH conditions relative to this sorption study ( cf .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The binding constant ( K b ) between 3N + and CyD was determined by using Benesi–Hilderbrand’s double reciprocal plot for a 1:1 complex according to the following equation: 1 I I 0 = 1 I I 0 + 1 ( I 1 I 0 ) K normalb nobreak0em0.25em⁡ 1 false[ CyD false] where I 0 , I , and I 1 are the fluorescence intensities of the free 3N + , 3N + /CyD mixture, and 3N + /CyD complex, respectively . The plot of 1/( I – I 0 ) against the reciprocal molar concentration of CyD provides the y -intercept as 1/( I 1 – I 0 ) and the gradient as 1/( I 1 – I 0 ) K b .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%