2008 Fourth International Conference on Networked Computing and Advanced Information Management 2008
DOI: 10.1109/ncm.2008.180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying Rough Sets to Maintain Data Consistency for High Degree Relations

Abstract: In order to deal with data inconsistency problems in high degree relations, a new method based on rough set theory is presented. The inconsistent data that exist under the attribute sets in the relations having possible functional dependencies can be found effectively by applying the suggested rough set based consistency checking method.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ANALYSIS BASED ON REDUCT AND CORE By the above procedure we can extract Core of condition attributes which are explicitly necessary for deriving knowledge and coming to some conclusions related to the extraction of knowledge [2], [4]. We need to pursue a method which would give information of whether a particular characteristic attribute is necessary or not, based on which it can be established whether a patient has influenza or not.…”
Section: Creation Of Decision Table For Knowledge Discoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ANALYSIS BASED ON REDUCT AND CORE By the above procedure we can extract Core of condition attributes which are explicitly necessary for deriving knowledge and coming to some conclusions related to the extraction of knowledge [2], [4]. We need to pursue a method which would give information of whether a particular characteristic attribute is necessary or not, based on which it can be established whether a patient has influenza or not.…”
Section: Creation Of Decision Table For Knowledge Discoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis over the decision table is performed in this paper by identifying those core attributes whose removal would results in further inconsistency in the decision table which was consistent other wise. In the above decision table [2][3] (Table II.) by dropping F 1 rules P 2 and P 3 turns out to be inconsistent and positive region of the algorithm changes. Therefore, F 1 forms the core of the attribute set in the decision table.…”
Section: Creation Of Decision Table For Knowledge Discoverymentioning
confidence: 99%