Applying Socio-Emotional Information Processing theory to explain child abuse risk: Emerging patterns from the COVID-19 pandemic

Rodriguez, Christina M.; Lee, Shawna J.; Ward, Kaitlin P.

doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2022.105954

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 71 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This does not provide a cross-sectional study group. Moreover, the significant role of parents' support in the social field and the importance of psychoeducation related to behavioral influences are emphasized as important protective factors in the context of violence against children [6,7]. The recently published findings of German researchers seem interesting.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The definition according to the WHO distinguishes an additional subgroup of children in adolescence [6]. According to this, adolescence as the second decade of life (10-19 years of age) is a time when significant physical, psychological, and social changes occur [7]. In Europe, almost every third child experiences some form of violence, according to the World Health Organization [8].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…We are also a country with moderately favorable economic conditions [10]. A number of risk factors for violence are typical regardless of cultural context: young age, male gender, weak social and family ties, separation from parents, peer environment, virtual violence, and low economic status of the family, but also intergenerational cultural transmission of violent behaviors [1,7]. The time of the COVID-19 pandemic in Poland, but also in most countries of the world, was associated with several burdensome circumstances [11], with domestic isolation, reduced social contact, worse economic conditions, and stress related to the risk of the disease to name a few [12].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Evaluation of Psychological and Physical Violence towards Children and Adolescents before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Lodz Voivodship

Grzejszczak,

Gabryelska,

Kotlicka-Antczak

et al. 2023

Brain Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: It has been shown that the course of COVID-19 infection in the under-18 population was in many cases sparsely symptomatic. In contrast, the impact of the pandemic on the psychological state is quite different. The risk of psychopathological symptoms in children and adolescents increased and the course of already present psychiatric disorders has often been exacerbated. Objectives: Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of psychological and physical violence among children and adolescents and its change during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as to investigate various factors that might affect violence. Methods: In this survey study, 782 responses were included, with 480 collected during the second and 302 during the fourth wave of COVID-19. In this cross-sectional study, an anonymous questionnaire was used to collect demographic data, medical history, mental state, psychopathological symptoms, as well as the presence of psychological, physical violence, and suicidal self-harm behaviors before (retrospectively) and during the COVID-19 pandemic in the under-18 population of the Lodz Voivodship. The survey was prepared using Google Forms. Results: A decrease in the prevalence of physical violence during both waves of the pandemic has been observed (6.39% vs. 3.45%; p < 0.001), with only a similar trend present for psychological violence 16.75% vs. 14.71%; p = 0.081). No difference between physical and psychological violence was present in different pandemic waves, type of flat or house individuals lived in, availability of one’s room, number of people living in the house, number of siblings, and type of school classes (p > 0.050). Older children (>15 years old) were more likely to be victims of psychological violence before and during the pandemic (both p < 0.001). A statistically significant model was obtained for psychological violence before (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.011) and during the pandemic (p = 0.007, R2 = 0.032). Risk factors for psychological violence before the pandemic included male gender (B = 0.531, p = 0.009, OR = 1.700), older age (B = 0.869, p = 0.001, OR = 2.385), and smaller city size (B = −0.187, p = 0.004, OR = 0.829), while for psychological violence during the pandemic, the risk factors were only male gender (B = 0.482, p = 0.022, OR = 1.620) and older age (B = 0.555, p = 0.046, OR = 1.742). No statistically significant models were created for physical violence (p > 0.050). Conclusions: The observed decrease in physical violence during the COVID-19 pandemic suggests that in the studied group, home environment was not the main source of physical violence. Yet, we did not find any predicting factors for this form of violence. Violence, both physical and psychological, is a dangerous phenomenon in the under-18 population both in the pre-pandemic period and in crisis situations such as the pandemic.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%