2010 29th IEEE Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems 2010
DOI: 10.1109/srds.2010.36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying Text Classification Algorithms in Web Services Robustness Testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The goal of this step is simply to understand the typical behavior expected from the Web service (e.g., typical response format). This information is not used in the definition of the tests, but can be used in the classification of the tests results, either by individually comparing the tests results with the regular workload output, or by using an automatic robustness classification procedure based on machine learning techniques [37].…”
Section: Fig 3 Example Of a Wsdl Filementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The goal of this step is simply to understand the typical behavior expected from the Web service (e.g., typical response format). This information is not used in the definition of the tests, but can be used in the classification of the tests results, either by individually comparing the tests results with the regular workload output, or by using an automatic robustness classification procedure based on machine learning techniques [37].…”
Section: Fig 3 Example Of a Wsdl Filementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in some cases, automated identification is not enough to decide if a given response is due to a robustness problem or not (e.g., in many cases it is difficult to automatically decide whether a given response represents an expected or unexpected behavior). We have recently studied the applicability of machine learning algorithms, typically used in text classification tasks, in the classification Web services robustness [37]. We found out that it is possible to obtain good results with these algorithms, i.e., a tool based on these algorithms can be used to automate the process effectively.…”
Section: Web Services Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the system under test is of large dimension, it might be difficult to carry out this task (especially considering that this kind of tests will then produce large amounts of data), as the tester may have many cases to analyze. Still, there are a few methods that can alleviate this task that, depending on the system being analyzed and on the tester's goals and budget, might apply (e.g., using machine learning algorithms to automatically identify incorrect responses [41]). Upon detection of a failure, the tester is very likely interested in further describing the failure, by, for instance, classifying the failure.…”
Section: Approach Execution Phasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then the service discovery is executed based on the classification result. In [5], service classification is considered as a powerful tool in web services robustness testing. In [6], a method based on service classification is proposed to evaluate trust models and the experiments prove that their method is more accurate.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Qos, which includes usability, response time, and other nonfunctional properties of services, each parameter can be evaluated in terms of numeric values. We also standardize each dimension of Qos (denoted as ) by(5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%