2018
DOI: 10.1002/eco.2015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying the eco‐hydrological equilibrium hypothesis to model root distribution in water‐limited forests

Abstract: Drought is a key driver of vegetation dynamics, but plant water‐uptake patterns and consequent plant responses to drought are poorly understood at large spatial scales. The capacity of vegetation to use soil water depends on its root distribution (RD). However, RD is extremely variable in space and difficult to measure in the field, which hinders accurate predictions of water fluxes and vegetation dynamics. We propose a new method to estimate RD within water balance models, assuming that vegetation is at eco‐h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
(203 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ecologically, to optimize growth and minimize water stress, stands should develop over time so as to remain somewhat above this threshold (Figure ) by adjusting stand K max and hence ∑ s E pot (Figure ). This resembles Eagelson's concept of the long‐term equilibrium between plant available water and the abundance of transpiring plants (Cabon et al, ; Eagleson, ). But the concept also provides a framework for charting long‐term forest growth or dieback in response to water availability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Ecologically, to optimize growth and minimize water stress, stands should develop over time so as to remain somewhat above this threshold (Figure ) by adjusting stand K max and hence ∑ s E pot (Figure ). This resembles Eagelson's concept of the long‐term equilibrium between plant available water and the abundance of transpiring plants (Cabon et al, ; Eagleson, ). But the concept also provides a framework for charting long‐term forest growth or dieback in response to water availability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Deviation from the predicted distribution can even be diagnostic of forest disturbance (Coomes et al , 2003; Sellan et al , 2017). This energy equivalence expectation, supported here by constant conductance per unit leaf area, represents a potential link between hydraulics, stand productivity, and the shaping of optimal canopy height and density by microsite (Eagleson, 1982; Cabon et al , 2018). The finding of constant conductance per unit leaf area with height growth is therefore important for understanding forest function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…A number of other optimization studies have used the concept of ecohydrological equilibrium, where allocation to leaves and roots is assumed to be in equilibrium with water availability (Eagleson, ; Westoby et al, ). The ecohydrological equilibrium framework has successfully reproduced observed trends in A L and root distributions across environmental gradients (Cabon, Martínez‐Vilalta, Martínez de Aragón, Poyatos, & De Cáceres, ; Schymanski, Sivapalan, Roderick, Beringer, & Hutley, ; Yang, Medlyn, De Kauwe, & Duursma, ).…”
Section: Flexible Allocation Approachesmentioning
confidence: 81%