1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(98)00047-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying the finite-element method for determination of tool wear in conventional deep-drawing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The two primary sources of tool wear in conventional deepdrawing are abrasive and adhesive wear mechanisms (Jensen et al, 1998). Abrasive wear is the result of scratching and micro-cutting of a surface by hard protuberances on the counter surface or by hard particles in the contact.…”
Section: Wear Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The two primary sources of tool wear in conventional deepdrawing are abrasive and adhesive wear mechanisms (Jensen et al, 1998). Abrasive wear is the result of scratching and micro-cutting of a surface by hard protuberances on the counter surface or by hard particles in the contact.…”
Section: Wear Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In conventional deep-drawing, tool wear is mainly concentrated over the draw-die profile (Oqvist, 2000;Christiansen and De Chiffre, 1997;Jensen et al, 1998;Hortig and Schmoeckel, 2001;Boher et al, 2005;Masen, 2004).…”
Section: Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2) [8][9][10]. These wear processes are initiated by the interfacial junctions that form in contact zones [9][10][11]. As a compressive load is applied, local pressures at the contact area become extremely high.…”
Section: Wear Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%