2001
DOI: 10.1108/lhtn.2001.23918aad.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying the Matching Person and Technology Evaluation Process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Project ENABLE's overarching purpose was to create accessible school library programmes and services. This likely requires a variety of approaches, including implementing principles of inclusive education and UD (Jung, 2007; Recommendation CM/Rec, 2009), using accessible books, materials and signage (Beneicke, Biesek and Brandon, 2003; Dieker, Berg and Jeanpierre, 2008), using digital media and AT (Myhill, 2009; Power and Paige, 2009; Scherer and Craddock, 2001), restructuring the physical environment (Avramidis, Bayliss and Burden, 2002), indoctrinating educators and TLs into the social model of disability (Oliver, 2004), encouraging and supporting collaborative teaching practices (Allen and Hughes‐Hassell, 2010), and providing ongoing professional development (Weiner, 2003).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Project ENABLE's overarching purpose was to create accessible school library programmes and services. This likely requires a variety of approaches, including implementing principles of inclusive education and UD (Jung, 2007; Recommendation CM/Rec, 2009), using accessible books, materials and signage (Beneicke, Biesek and Brandon, 2003; Dieker, Berg and Jeanpierre, 2008), using digital media and AT (Myhill, 2009; Power and Paige, 2009; Scherer and Craddock, 2001), restructuring the physical environment (Avramidis, Bayliss and Burden, 2002), indoctrinating educators and TLs into the social model of disability (Oliver, 2004), encouraging and supporting collaborative teaching practices (Allen and Hughes‐Hassell, 2010), and providing ongoing professional development (Weiner, 2003).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, ATs have long been essential to augment processes, equipment and technology so that people with various disabilities can access mainstream programmes and services (Myhill, 2009; Scherer and Craddock, 2001). The principles of UD are intended to create mainstream products that require no AT but which are usable without augmentation by the widest variety of user abilities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…62 For example, the item response theory which comprised of the mathematical tools and statistical methods can analyze items and scales, create and manage health outcome measures, and assess selfreported health outcomes. 63 Similarly, the matching person and technology 64,65 can also be used as an assessment procedure to determine the appropriate AT for a particular user in the given environment. The qualitative and quantitative assessment based on 13 technological criteria has also been used to assess AT solutions.…”
Section: Process Features or Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%