2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-016-3240-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying the Randomized Response Technique in Business Ethics Research: The Misuse of Information Systems Resources in the Workplace

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To assess the mean value of intention of illegal waste disposal, we used the UQD in a Likert scale [37,38,39] in this study. An unrelated question was formed to pair with each sensitive question, as illustrated in Table 3.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To assess the mean value of intention of illegal waste disposal, we used the UQD in a Likert scale [37,38,39] in this study. An unrelated question was formed to pair with each sensitive question, as illustrated in Table 3.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique has been widely used in social science studies for nearly 50 years [7]. In this half century, the technique has also been modified or extended to different designs [3,34,35,36,37,38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Implementing voluntary initiatives for businesses to improve their employees' labor conditions and implementing socially significant projects creates a particular environmental protection sphere. Application of these practices on corporate responsibility in developing markets are found in the following readings: Benlemlih (2019) , Borges et al (2018) , Cheong et al (2017) , Denisov et al (2018) , Ge and Zhao (2017) , Gong and Ho (2018) , Han and Zheng (2016) , Krivtsov (2014) , Lee et al (2018) , Li and Liu (2018) , Malik and Kanwal (2018) , Marquis et al (2017) , Morozova et al (2018) , Mukherjee et al (2018) , Nazri et al (2018) , Popkova (2017) , Schrempf-Stirling (2018) , and Veselovsky et al (2018) , Chu et al (2018) , Frig et al (2018) , Harjoto and Laksmana (2018)) , Kansal et al (2018) , Sheikh (2019) , Utgård (2018) .…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is our belief that a self-report questionnaire is a sound scientific method of collecting primary data as long as respondents are assured of anonymity. Nevertheless, future research should investigate the potential biases between actual and reported behavior and develop a methodology such as using randomized response technique to reduce response distortion due to social desirability [101][102][103].…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%