2019
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying the SRL vs. ERL Theory to the Knowledge of Achievement Emotions in Undergraduate University Students

Abstract: The SRL vs.ERL Theory predicts that a student's own self-regulation and the regulatory nature of the context are factors that jointly determine the student's level of motivational-affective variables. However, this principle has not yet been verified in the case of achievement emotions. The aim of this research was to test this prediction, with the hypothesis that students' level of self-regulation (low-medium-high), in interaction with the regulatory nature of the teaching (low-medium-high), would determine p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
55
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
11
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is consistent with prior evidence from this line of research (de la Fuente et al, 2017b), as well as from other studies (Holinka, 2015;Collie et al, 2019). On the other hand, analysis of the combined effect of the variables showed two independent main effects, both from SR and from RT, but did not show a crossover interaction, consistently with previous evidence on the effect of these two variables on coping strategies (de la Fuente et al, 2017bFuente et al, , 2019. Finally, when analyzing a graded increase in the combination level (scale of 1-5), the results are very consistent with the idea that the combination of the two types of regulation (person × context) significantly predicts a decrease in emotionfocused strategies and an increase in problem-focused strategies.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result is consistent with prior evidence from this line of research (de la Fuente et al, 2017b), as well as from other studies (Holinka, 2015;Collie et al, 2019). On the other hand, analysis of the combined effect of the variables showed two independent main effects, both from SR and from RT, but did not show a crossover interaction, consistently with previous evidence on the effect of these two variables on coping strategies (de la Fuente et al, 2017bFuente et al, , 2019. Finally, when analyzing a graded increase in the combination level (scale of 1-5), the results are very consistent with the idea that the combination of the two types of regulation (person × context) significantly predicts a decrease in emotionfocused strategies and an increase in problem-focused strategies.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Human learning takes its shape when the individual's self-regulating ability (SR) and the external regulatory features of the context (ER) are combined. Five types of interactions are possible (de la Fuente et al, 2019). According to this principle, coping strategies are predisposed by mediating factors, both internal (self-regulation, SR: levels 1-3) and external (external regulation, ER: levels 1-3).…”
Section: Srl Vs Erl Theory As a Research Heuristic In The Teaching Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are consistent with prior evidence that has established associations between positive emotionality and self-regulation, and between negative emotionality and a lack of selfregulation [47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66]. Results presented in this research study also reveal the specific strategic coping behaviors that are associated with students' emotions and their ultimate emotional state of engagement vs. burnout, suggesting that coping strategies are a meta-emotional variable, or, as their name implies, a behavioral strategy, adjusted or maladjusted, for managing emotions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This result is highly interesting, because it suggests that the teaching process is involved. Although the teaching process is not the object of this analysis, recent evidence shows that teaching does play its role, and university students' emotional state is the combined product of students' personal characteristics and contextual characteristics [66,67]. The proposed model, however, was fulfilled in the testing situation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A subsequent study confirmed the influence that academic self-efficacy and emotions have on the academic success of university students. Thus, higher levels of positive emotionality were related to higher levels of success ( De la Fuente et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%