Applying the Theoretical Domains Framework to identify barriers and targeted interventions to enhance nurses’ use of electronic medication management systems in two Australian hospitals

Abstract

BackgroundMedication errors harm hospitalised patients and increase health care costs. Electronic Medication Management Systems (EMMS) have been shown to reduce medication errors. However, nurses do not always use EMMS as intended, largely because implementation of such patient safety strategies requires clinicians to change their existing practices, routines and behaviour. This study uses the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to identify barriers and targeted interventions to enhance nurses’ appropriate use of EMMS in two Australian hospitals.MethodsThis qualitative study draws on in-depth interviews with 19 acute care nurses who used EMMS. A convenience sampling approach was used. Nurses working on the study units (N = 6) in two hospitals were invited to participate if available during the data collection period. Interviews inductively explored nurses’ experiences of using EMMS (step 1). Data were analysed using the TDF to identify theory-derived barriers to nurses’ appropriate use of EMMS (step 2). Relevant behaviour change techniques (BCTs) were identified to overcome key barriers to using EMMS (step 3) followed by the identification of potential literature-informed targeted intervention strategies to operationalise the identified BCTs (step 4).ResultsBarriers to nurses’ use of EMMS in acute care were represented by nine domains of the TDF. Two closely linked domains emerged as major barriers to EMMS use: Environmental Context and Resources (availability and properties of computers on wheels (COWs); technology characteristics; specific contexts; competing demands and time pressure) and Social/Professional Role and Identity (conflict between using EMMS appropriately and executing behaviours critical to nurses’ professional role and identity).The study identified three potential BCTs to address the Environmental Context and Resources domain barrier: adding objects to the environment; restructuring the physical environment; and prompts and cues. Seven BCTs to address Social/Professional Role and Identity were identified: social process of encouragement; pressure or support; information about others’ approval; incompatible beliefs; identification of self as role model; framing/reframing; social comparison; and demonstration of behaviour. It proposes several targeted interventions to deliver these BCTs.ConclusionsThe TDF provides a useful approach to identify barriers to nurses’ prescribed use of EMMS, and can inform the design of targeted theory-based interventions to improve EMMS implementation.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0572-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Increasing the uptake of stroke upper limb guideline recommendations with occupational therapists and physiotherapists. A qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework

“…cognitive rehabilitation) and potentially across other allied health disciplines. Using a theoretic framework to guide barrier and motivator identification is supported by implementation research (Debono et al, 2017;Moore et al, 2018;Moullin, Sabater-Hern andez, Fernandez-Llimos, & Benrimoj, 2015). Barrier identification is a critical first step, however, future research should include intervention mapping with its usefulness tested.…”

The work is never ending: uncovering teamwork sustainability using realistic evaluation

“…The TDF is used to analyze barriers for implementation and to tailor interventions aimed at influencing practitioners' behaviors (Francis et al, 2012). Recent publications include interventions that target nurses' use of electronic records (Debono et al, 2017), diabetes prevention behaviors in Thailand (Suntornsut et al, 2016) and chest pain risk evaluation (Skoien et al, 2016).…”

Pharmacists detecting atrial fibrillation in general practice: a qualitative focus group study

“…Qualitative data were analysed in NVivo (version 12) using the deductive TDF approach, as detailed in Figure 1. 32,33 TDF domains most likely to influence the service proposed were selected using the criteria adapted from Islam et al 34 The major themes and sub-themes within these domains were selected for final analysis of key facilitators and barriers. Deviant case analysis was performed to ensure that perspectives that diverged from dominant trends were not overlooked.…”