2020
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042690
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying the Three Delays Model to understand emergency care seeking and delivery in rural Bangladesh: a qualitative study

Abstract: ObjectivesThe Three Delays Model has been commonly used to understand and prevent maternal mortality but has not been systematically applied to emergency medical conditions more generally. The objective of this study was to identify delays in emergency medical care seeking and delivery in rural Bangladesh and factors contributing to these delays by using the Three Delays Model as a framework.DesignA qualitative approach was used. Data were collected through focus group discussions and in-depth interviews using… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The three-delay model was developed by Thaddeus and Maine in 1994 to facilitate the identification of indirect factors, from the onset of obstetric complications to the birth of the baby [ 17 , 18 ]. Delay one is related to delay in deciding to seek care, which is commonly influenced by negative past experiences, late recognition of the problem, and financial problems [ 19 ]. Delay two, on the other hand, is related to identifying and reaching care, which is usually determined by the availability of transport and accessibility of the facility [ 20 – 22 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three-delay model was developed by Thaddeus and Maine in 1994 to facilitate the identification of indirect factors, from the onset of obstetric complications to the birth of the baby [ 17 , 18 ]. Delay one is related to delay in deciding to seek care, which is commonly influenced by negative past experiences, late recognition of the problem, and financial problems [ 19 ]. Delay two, on the other hand, is related to identifying and reaching care, which is usually determined by the availability of transport and accessibility of the facility [ 20 – 22 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distribution of the mode of delivery among the women with complicated pregnancy was about 83.6% delivered by caesarean section and only 16.4% delivered by normal vaginal delivery. Among the women with complicated pregnancy 61.6% caesarean section were due to pregnancy complications, about 16…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cause of these huge percentage of caesarean sections were due to maximum number of the respondents having history of antenatal complications and many of them were referred from some other hospital after trial for normal vaginal delivery and some cesareans were done due to failed trial in the study place. Some study found that PROM was associated with high rate of caesarean section [16][17][18][19] . The mode of delivery of those study was also similar to this study.…”
Section: Dscussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model provides a useful framework to examine factors that influence the timely receipt of care at each stage. The Three Delays Model has been applied to understand the delays to care in other settings, including additional areas of maternal health, neonatal mortality, pediatric cancer, and emergency care seeking [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. In each of these settings, the relative contribution of each of the different delays varied [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Three Delays Model has been applied to understand the delays to care in other settings, including additional areas of maternal health, neonatal mortality, pediatric cancer, and emergency care seeking [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. In each of these settings, the relative contribution of each of the different delays varied [16]. The Three Delays Model is a useful tool to map patient experiences and identify site-specific delays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%