2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.mycmed.2013.07.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Apport du milieu chromogène CHROMagar ® Candida dans le diagnostic mycologique des levures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, C. albicans (43.37%) was the most common yeast encountered in all clinical sources. This result is consistent with previous reports from symptomatic patients in Burkina Faso and other parts of the world [5,[32][33][34][35][36]. In this study, Candida non-albicans species together represented a greater proportion than C. albicans did, meaning that in Burkina Faso, almost half of suspected candidiasis cases are caused by non-albicans species.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In our study, C. albicans (43.37%) was the most common yeast encountered in all clinical sources. This result is consistent with previous reports from symptomatic patients in Burkina Faso and other parts of the world [5,[32][33][34][35][36]. In this study, Candida non-albicans species together represented a greater proportion than C. albicans did, meaning that in Burkina Faso, almost half of suspected candidiasis cases are caused by non-albicans species.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The chromatic agar has been well documented in previous studies as for its high sensitivity and specificity for the identification of the most commonly encountered Candida spp. [1315]. After 72h of incubation of Chromatic Candida plates at 37°C, green colonies were identified as C. albicans , creamy colored colonies were regarded as C. glabrata , and C. krusei colonies were pink with a whitish border.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The characterization of the mycobiome structure can be done using both culture-dependent and independent methods [4]. Culture-dependent techniques, which generally combine methods such as microscopy [10], biochemical assays [11] and growth on selective media [12], represent a classical approach for the profiling of complex microbial ecosystems, and have the great advantage of allowing the determination of the viable fraction of the mycobiome. However, this is a time-consuming approach and, most importantly, blind to species that are obligate symbionts or have complex nutritional requirements or that are otherwise hard or impossible to raise in culture [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%