Appraisal of work ability in relation to job-specific health requirements in ambulance workers

Abstract

PurposeTo gain insight into which job-specific health requirements relate to work ability, the following two research questions were formulated: Which job-specific health requirements are associated with the appraisal of work ability in ambulance drivers and paramedics? How are appraisals of physical and mental work ability associated with the appraisal of overall work ability in ambulance drivers and paramedics? MethodWorkers Health Surveillance cross-sectional data of 506 ambulance workers (236 drivers and 270 paramedics) were used. The tests for specific job requirements were divided into six categories. Work ability was appraised as overall, physical and mental/emotional. Multiple linear stepwise regression analyses were used to model the associations.ResultsOutcomes in ‘raised alertness and judgment ability’ (R 2 = 0.09), ‘job-specific physical abilities’ (R 2 = 0.10) and ‘emotional peak load’ (R 2 = 0.07) significantly explained appraised overall, physical and mental/emotional work ability. Physical and mental/emotional work ability together explained 48.3% of the variance of overall work ability. The explained variance by physical and mental/emotional work ability was almost 4% higher in drivers than in paramedics.ConclusionsOverall work ability was significantly explained by outcomes in ‘raised alertness and judgment ability’ and ‘emotional peak load.’ Physical work ability was significantly explained by ‘job-specific physical abilities’ and ‘raised alertness and judgment ability’ outcomes, while ‘emotional peak load’ and ‘raised alertness and judgment ability’ outcomes significantly explained mental/emotional work ability. Physical and mental/emotional work ability explains the same proportion of variance in overall work ability.

Work Ability and Vitality in Coach Drivers: An RCT to Study the Effectiveness of a Self-Management Intervention during the Peak Season

“…A mean WAS score of 7.3 is considerably lower than scores for ambulance workers, an average working population, a heterogeneous sample of workers, elderly construction workers, or elderly workers, (8.5, 8.1, 7.95, 8.0, and 8.57, respectively). The score is comparable to people returning to work after sick leave (7.4) [32,33,48,49,50,51]. Vitality scores at the beginning of the peak season are comparable with values found in the literature [52].…”

Work ability and percentage of hours worked related to limitations in patients with upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders: a cross-sectional cohort study

“…Work ability can be determined in several ways. One of the ways to assess work ability in practice is with jobspecific testing in preventive medical examinations or observing work activities by occupational physicians [11]. Another more frequently used way to assess work ability is by letting workers appraise their own work ability [12].…”

The new why when designing mandatory medical examinations

“…Examples of job-specific medicals developed with the ‘ new why ’, ‘ how ’ and ‘ what ’ in the last decade have led to the modernization of mandatory medicals in our department for ambulance workers [ 9 ], firefighters [ 10 ], hospital physicians [ 11 ], rail safety workers [ 12 ] and workers in the construction industry [ 13 ]. This revised way of performing medical examinations has had a different impact on the practice of occupational physicians.…”