SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2017 2017
DOI: 10.1190/segam2017-17791860.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Appraising structural models using seismic data: Problem and challenges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Herron, 2015), although increasing development on the basis of machine learning algorithms will potentially lead to improved algorithms in the future. Nonetheless, to manage possibly different interpretations and get a sense about how they quantitatively honor the initial seismic data, several authors have proposed to consider alternative geological structural models and then either generate synthetic seismic images by convolution (e.g., Lallier et al, 2012;Botter et al, 2016), or forward model wave propagation to generate synthetic seismograms (Irakarama et al, 2017). Computing misfit functions remains, however a significant challenge as cycle skipping is likely to occur in the presence of large interpretation uncertainties owing for instance to poor illumination.…”
Section: Uncertainties Related To Different Data Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Herron, 2015), although increasing development on the basis of machine learning algorithms will potentially lead to improved algorithms in the future. Nonetheless, to manage possibly different interpretations and get a sense about how they quantitatively honor the initial seismic data, several authors have proposed to consider alternative geological structural models and then either generate synthetic seismic images by convolution (e.g., Lallier et al, 2012;Botter et al, 2016), or forward model wave propagation to generate synthetic seismograms (Irakarama et al, 2017). Computing misfit functions remains, however a significant challenge as cycle skipping is likely to occur in the presence of large interpretation uncertainties owing for instance to poor illumination.…”
Section: Uncertainties Related To Different Data Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both in bottom-up and top-down approaches, the feedback coming from physical simulations (reservoir production data, subsidence, acoustic sensors, etc.) must be re-injected spatially to better characterize geological features and reduce uncertainties (e.g., Irakarama et al (2017)). This is a highly challenging problem, which calls for a common geological data model that is able to represent knowledge at multiple scales and transfer information gained from various sources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%