2014
DOI: 10.3138/cjpe.29.2.104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Appreciative Inquiry and Evaluation – Getting to What Works

Abstract: Appreciative Inquiry (Ai) is described as the cooperative search for the best in people, their organizations, and the world around them. Th is article describes how Ai has been applied to evaluation in ways that build upon strengths and generate support for improvements. An initial criticism of AI can be that it focuses only on positivity and fosters an unrealistic view of human experience. Contributing to tension with the AI process is a mistaken belief that negative phenomena must be ignored. However, evalua… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(55 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…What must be included in a ''theory-driven evaluation'' to justify its designation as theorydriven (Coryn, Noakes, Westine, & Schröter, 2011)? What is the core of appreciative inquiry evaluation (MacCoy, 2014;Preskill & Catsambas, 2006)? What are the essential elements of Aboriginal Program evaluations (Jacob & Desautels, 2014) or indigenous methods generally (Chilisa, 2012)?…”
Section: The Fidelity Challenge In Implementing Distinct Evaluation Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What must be included in a ''theory-driven evaluation'' to justify its designation as theorydriven (Coryn, Noakes, Westine, & Schröter, 2011)? What is the core of appreciative inquiry evaluation (MacCoy, 2014;Preskill & Catsambas, 2006)? What are the essential elements of Aboriginal Program evaluations (Jacob & Desautels, 2014) or indigenous methods generally (Chilisa, 2012)?…”
Section: The Fidelity Challenge In Implementing Distinct Evaluation Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Highlight challenging findings and ask stakeholders to suggest how they could be presented in the report and what forms of conclusions can be drawn. This is a common technique in a number of evaluation approaches, such as appreciative inquiry (e.g., MacCoy, 2014; Preskill & Catsambas, 2006) or developmental evaluation (Patton, 2011). Such an approach can help generate understanding of the evaluation—and later support for its findings and for taking action in response.…”
Section: How To Manage Evaluations So That Inappropriate Pressures Tomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a variety of evaluation approaches that support a positive thinking approach. Arguably, the best known of these is appreciative inquiry (e.g., MacCoy, 2014; Preskill & Catsambas, 2006), but Stame (2014) and Stame and Lo Presti (2015) identify and discuss a range of other evaluation strategies that support positive thinking approaches. Perrin (2014) and Bohni Nielsen, Turksema, and van der Knaap (2015) consider the rationale and benefits of a variety of such approaches and identify ways in which evaluation can help identify and support successful policies.…”
Section: How To Manage Evaluations So That Inappropriate Pressures Tomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Innovation within an organisation often requires a collaborative culture in which groups of employees explore new ideas [6,7]. For those making meaningful contributions to an organisation's collaboration and innovation, wellbeing is increased [8].…”
Section: Innovation Versus Wellbeingmentioning
confidence: 99%