2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.04.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Appreciative Inquiry as an intervention to change nursing practice in in-patient settings: An integrative review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
57
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the data presented here continues to add evidence of the applicability of appreciative inquiry in health care research (Trajkovski, Schmied, Vickers & Jackson. 2013) and in in-patient settings (Watkins, Dewar & Kennedy 2016). Additional studies, in other contexts and settings, are required to further evaluate the effectiveness of this approach, possibly using larger samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the data presented here continues to add evidence of the applicability of appreciative inquiry in health care research (Trajkovski, Schmied, Vickers & Jackson. 2013) and in in-patient settings (Watkins, Dewar & Kennedy 2016). Additional studies, in other contexts and settings, are required to further evaluate the effectiveness of this approach, possibly using larger samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Watkins et al (2011) defined AI as a theory and a practice for approaching change from a holistic framework. AI has also been applied in health care contexts (Trajkovski, Schmied, Vickers & Jackson, 2013), as well as in in-patient settings (Watkins, Dewar & Kennedy, 2016) to seek to change practice.…”
Section: The Ai Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tosati, Lawthong, and Suwanmonkha (2015) highlight the use of AI in supporting the fundamental learning methods of inquiry, dialogue, reflection, collaboration, and feedback. In nursing practice, there often exist underlying anxieties that can affect group dynamics; these anxieties can be better understood utilizing an AI framework to highlight strengths while confronting damaging group dynamics (Watkins, Dewar, & Kennedy, 2016). The AI framework supports the creation of a safe environment that promotes personal sharing and the development of deep connections through respect for uniqueness and acknowledgement of diversity (Dematteo & Reeves, 2011) and aligns appropriately with the exploratory nature of this project to inform teaching and learning through the application of simulated-person methodology.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Inconsistent use of AI may lead to loss of participant involvement (Watkins et al, 2016) and, according to Lykkeslet et al (2014), may hamper lasting changes and cultural change. The degree of participatory involvement will influence the degree of the success of the AI process; the higher the number of individuals involved, the better the basis for change of care (Trajkovski et al, 2013b).…”
Section: Participating In Ai: When Closeness Leads To Opennessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By also involving patients and relatives in the AI process in hospitals, practices that had been taken for granted were challenged, replacing uncertainty with openness and confidentiality (Dewar & Nolan, 2013), and facilitating the implementation of new practices . Participant involvement can be missed if AI criteria, such as a democratic process, equality, and voluntary participation, are not employed in research (Watkins, Dewar, & Kennedy, 2016). Several studies consider leaders as key figures in changing processes, and they emphasize the importance of management support in enabling the application of AI (Dewar & Nolan, 2013;Shield, Looze, Tyler, Lepore, & Miller, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%