Approach for Using Journal Citation Reports in Determining the Dynamics of Half-Life Indicators of Journals

Libkind, A. N.; Маркусова, В. А.; Libkind, I. A.

doi:10.3103/s000510552003005x

Cited by 8 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Second, some scientists may have their publications split into two or more Scopus ID files and some Scopus ID files may include papers by more than one author. Nevertheless, Scopus data have high precision and recall (98.1% and 94.4%, respectively) [4], therefore this is unlikely to be a source of major error. Third, we could not evaluate whether the massive advent of the COVID-19 literature and of its citation footprint affected (negatively) the non-COVID-19 literature and its citations.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…We used a copy of the Scopus database [4] extracted on August 1, 2021. We identified all publications published and indexed in 2020 and 2021 as of that date.…”

Section: Covid-19 and Non-covid-19 Work Published In 2020-2021mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This shift of the research enterprise and massive production of COVID-19-related publications ("covidization") may have had implications for citations to recent scientific work. In most scientific disciplines, most papers get few, if any, citations in the first year, and citations appear gradually, spread over many years, with citation half-lives that typically exceed 5 years for most scientific fields and may exceed 10 years for some fields [4][5][6]. The half-life of the citation pattern for COVID-19 work is still unknown, given the short-term follow-up for the COVID-19 published papers.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Massive covidization of research citations and the citation elite

Ioannidis

Bendavid

Salholz-Hillel

et al. 2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Massive scientific productivity accompanied the COVID-19 pandemic. We evaluated the citation impact of COVID-19 publications relative to all scientific work published in 2020-2021 and assessed the impact on scientist citation profiles. Using Scopus data until August 1, 2021, COVID-19 items accounted for 4% of papers published, 20% of citations received to papers published in 2020-2021 and >30% of citations received in 36 of the 174 disciplines of science (up to 79.3% in General and Internal Medicine). Across science, 98 of the 100 most-cited papers published in 2020-2021 were related to COVID-19. 110 scientists received >=10,000 citations for COVID-19 work, but none received >=10,000 citations for non-COVID-19 work published in 2020-2021. For many scientists, citations to their COVID-19 work already accounted for more than half of their total career citation count. Overall, these data show a strong covidization of research citations across science with major impact on shaping the citation elite.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…We used a copy of the Scopus database [4] extracted on August 1, 2021. We identified all publications published and indexed in 2020 and 2021 as of that date.…”

Section: Covid-19 and Non-covid-19 Work Published In 2020-2021mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Massive covidization of research citations and the citation elite

Ioannidis

Bendavid

Salholz-Hillel

et al. 2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This shift of the research enterprise and massive production of COVID-19–related publications (“covidization”) may have had implications for citations to recent scientific work. In most scientific disciplines, most papers get few, if any, citations in the first year, and citations appear gradually, spread over many years, with citation half-lives that typically exceed 5 y for most scientific fields and may exceed 10 y for some fields ( 3 – 5 ). The half-life of the citation pattern for COVID-19 work is still unknown, given the short-term follow-up for the COVID-19 published papers.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Massive covidization of research citations and the citation elite

Ioannidis

Bendavid

Salholz-Hillel

et al. 2022

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Massive scientific productivity accompanied the COVID-19 pandemic. We evaluated the citation impact of COVID-19 publications relative to all scientific work published in 2020 to 2021 and assessed the impact on scientist citation profiles. Using Scopus data until August 1, 2021, COVID-19 items accounted for 4% of papers published, 20% of citations received to papers published in 2020 to 2021, and >30% of citations received in 36 of the 174 disciplines of science (up to 79.3% in general and internal medicine). Across science, 98 of the 100 most-cited papers published in 2020 to 2021 were related to COVID-19; 110 scientists received ≥10,000 citations for COVID-19 work, but none received ≥10,000 citations for non–COVID-19 work published in 2020 to 2021. For many scientists, citations to their COVID-19 work already accounted for more than half of their total career citation count. Overall, these data show a strong covidization of research citations across science, with major impact on shaping the citation elite.

show abstract

“…The top 10 issuing institutions are shown in Table 3. Among them, "year" represents the year of publication, and half-life is the number of years that shows how the literature is calculated forward from the statistical year, accounting for 50% of the total number of citations of the literature up to the statistical year, which represents the classic degree of the literature [29]. The greater the half-life, the longer the influence.…”

Section: Analysis Of Institutionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Quantitative Analysis of the Research Development Status and Trends of Tannery Wastewater Treatment Technology

Jia

Wang³

et al. 2022

Catalysts

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In order to better grasp the development and trends of tannery wastewater (TWW) treatment research, this paper provides a review of the TWW treatment research dynamics based on the Web of Science (WoS) database and using CiteSpace software. The research dynamics, hot topics, evolutionary history and research trends in this field are revealed. The results showed that research related to TWW treatment has shown a high growth trend in the number of articles in recent years, and India was outstanding in terms of influence in this area. The keyword clustering analysis showed that the main research hotspots in the field of TWW treatment were biological treatment processes (phytoremediation, constructed wetlands, anaerobic treatment and biofilm reactors) and chemical treatment processes (coagulation and flocculation, and advanced oxidation processes). The analysis of new research frontiers showed that the bioremediation and the application of biofuel cells in TWW will become important research directions in the future.

show abstract

Approach for Using Journal Citation Reports in Determining the Dynamics of Half-Life Indicators of Journals

Cited by 8 publications

References 4 publications

Massive covidization of research citations and the citation elite

Massive covidization of research citations and the citation elite

Massive covidization of research citations and the citation elite

Quantitative Analysis of the Research Development Status and Trends of Tannery Wastewater Treatment Technology

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About