Annals of Scientific Society for Assembly, Handling and Industrial Robotics 2021 2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-74032-0_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approach of a Decision Support Matrix for the Implementation of Exoskeletons in Industrial Workplaces

Abstract: Despite the advancing trends in automation, workers in industrial workplaces often face repetitive tasks with heavy workloads. Whenever methods or adaptions in both technology and organization are insufficient to improve working conditions, personal-related interventions as exoskeletons come into question. They may prove successful in alleviating musculoskeletal disorders and relieving physical strain. The rising number of market-ready exoskeletons often challenges users or companies to select an appropriate s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Relevance is given to exoskeleton evaluation with the study by Hein and Lueth [91] that focuses on user acceptance aspects and describes the classification of evaluations for user acceptance using the criteria of the target, type, test environment, and measuring tool. Additionally, Ralfs et al [92], more in general, propose a 7-step model for comprehensive evaluation of industrial exoskeletons: characterization, preparation, pre, core, and post-evaluation, analysis, and reflection, also proposing a test course made of different situations to assess the exoskeletons. Furthermore, de Looze et al [93] offer a three-stage approach for measuring usefulness (potential fit), workload reduction effect, user acceptance, performance, and fatigue during the day.…”
Section: Guidelines and Methodological Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relevance is given to exoskeleton evaluation with the study by Hein and Lueth [91] that focuses on user acceptance aspects and describes the classification of evaluations for user acceptance using the criteria of the target, type, test environment, and measuring tool. Additionally, Ralfs et al [92], more in general, propose a 7-step model for comprehensive evaluation of industrial exoskeletons: characterization, preparation, pre, core, and post-evaluation, analysis, and reflection, also proposing a test course made of different situations to assess the exoskeletons. Furthermore, de Looze et al [93] offer a three-stage approach for measuring usefulness (potential fit), workload reduction effect, user acceptance, performance, and fatigue during the day.…”
Section: Guidelines and Methodological Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fundamental need for adaptation arises from the support context and the interaction of the human, exoskeleton, and activity. Accordingly, the support situation must be viewed holistically as the interaction of people, exoskeleton technology, and activity ( Weidner et al, 2013 ; Di Pasquale et al, 2021 ; Hoffmann et al, 2021 ; Ralfs et al, 2022 ). The interactions may require a corresponding adaptation of the support characteristics.…”
Section: Methods For Qualifying Exoskeletonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of human-machine interaction, this refers to the necessary adaptation of the system and its support behavior to the context. The context is raised by the user with his experience, skills, and qualifications, performing a specific task in its complexity and deterministic sequence with the appropriate tool in a particular work environment and under the given external influences ( Casla et al, 2019 ; Hoffmann et al, 2021 ; Ralfs et al, 2022 ) at a specific moment of the scenario, the support situation. The support of the exoskeleton can thereby be described as the relationship between the angular range within the motion space of the supported body joint, and the corresponding applied force or generated torque.…”
Section: Fundamentals For Developing the Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Projects with robots, cobots, wearable devices such as exoskeletons (Elprama et al, 2022;Ralfs et al, 2022) (Blanco et al, 2022;Kim et al, 2021;Figueredo et al, 2020;Giovanelli and Vareille, 2018;De Looze et al, 2016). For Viteckova et al (2013), commercially available exoskeletons have been predominantly used for rehabilitation purposes.…”
Section: Advanced Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%