There has been an ongoing request to make semiconductor devices smaller and smaller. The cellblock size of SRAM is predominated by both a gate-to-contact space and a poly-to-poly space. The gate-to-contact space is defined by the leakage value from the poly electrode. So we focused on the poly-to-poly space for all shrinkage.We have been studying connected line splitting techniques. We named it ELS (end of line splitting) technology. A critical issue is to control gaps between two narrow gate-poly's line-ends or between a narrow gatepoly's line-end and a neighboring wire-poly line due to lower contrast in low-k1 lithography. In the case of standard cells, especially, the patterning of narrow gate-poly projected to wire-poly is easy to shorten. To prevent this electrical short, designers avoid keeping a narrow gap and small chip size. In order to realize a narrower gap, a splitting technique, well-known and adopted in poly's line-ends of SRAM that are regularly arrayed, is effective. We are investigating how to extend this technique as ELS technology for random logic of poly toward creating a 32-nm node.In this paper, the authors focus on the following topics: 1) data preparation technique, and 2) experimental results. Then this technology for the poly layer of random logic LSI devices is compared with result of conventional single exposure and double pattering technology. In addition, the result that overlay control issue for ELS technology is not severe compared with pitch doubling technology is described. ELS technology can help the designer and our lithographer to reduce the gap and reduce the array grid size of standard cells.Keywords: End of line, double pattering, low-k1 lithography, SRAM
INTRODUCTONThe demand for making LSI's smaller has been growing every year; the ITRS roadmap of lithographic technology says that it is expected to achieve a patterning of HP (half pitch) 45-nm for gate-poly pitch at 32-nm node logic LSI. But unfortunately the lithographic infrastructure that supports this doesn't meet our schedule. To reduce the pitch resolution, a well-known Rayleigh's criterion has three important parameters. One is the k1-factor that means process difficulty, the second is the wavelength of the light source, and the third is the NA (numerical aperture) of projection lens. These three parameters compose the equation of HP = k1*(wavelength /NA). One industry expects EUV (extreme ultra-violet) lithography will be able to lower the wavelength of exposure light, another industry expects higher index immersion lithography will be able to increase the NA of the exposure lens. In the case of ArF immersion lithography, certainly, the requirement of 1.38-NA toward 32-nm node for logic LSI is discussed in ITRS 2007. Recently, the fact that these two candidates have been failing meets the requirements for the mass production in 2009-2011 has been reported [1,2]. Therefore, the lithographer should have not only managed to raise the practical k1-factor, but also lithographers should consider achieving a low-k1 litho...