2015
DOI: 10.1007/s12562-015-0923-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approach to determine individual trophic level and the difference in food sources of Japanese anchovy Engraulis japonicus in Sagami Bay, based on compound-specific nitrogen stable isotope analysis of amino acids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…L. japonicus) belong to food chains with intermediate baseline values (9.6−18.9 ‰). These results are consistent with our expectation of a large variation in the δ 15 N baseline values in Sagami Bay (Won et al 2007, Miyachi et al 2015).…”
Section: Food Web Structuresupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…L. japonicus) belong to food chains with intermediate baseline values (9.6−18.9 ‰). These results are consistent with our expectation of a large variation in the δ 15 N baseline values in Sagami Bay (Won et al 2007, Miyachi et al 2015).…”
Section: Food Web Structuresupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Open square marks the sampling site for this study. Sites of previous studies marked as follows: filled triangle, Chikaraishi et al (2014); filled diamond, Miyachi et al (2015). Arrows represent the Kuroshio and its branched currents between glutamic acid and phenylalanine in consumers (e.g.…”
Section: Calculation Of Tp and Isotopic Baselinementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These processes are not mutually exclusive, and both appear to impact TDF Glu by affecting the flux of nitrogen through transamination and deamination isotopic branch points. There are many systems that appear to be well characterized by a single Δ Glu/Phe value, where there are minimal changes in diet quality and/or mode of nitrogen excretion within a food web (e.g., Chikaraishi et al, 2009Chikaraishi et al, , 2011Ishikawa et al, 2014;Kruse et al, 2015;Miyachi et al, 2015). However, the accuracy of TP Glu/Phe estimates may be improved by directly incorporating Δ Glu/Phe variability into TP Glu/Phe estimates in systems where such changes do occur (e.g., Lorrain et al, 2009;Dale et al, 2011;Choy et al, 2012;Germain et al, 2013;Ruiz-Cooley et al, 2013Matthews and Ferguson, 2014;McMahon et al, 2015b).…”
Section: Variability In Trophic Discrimination Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The superior precision and accuracy of this method makes it suitable for studies attempting to resolve fine-scale variability in N sources and TPs. For instance, among primary or secondary consumers in marine pelagic systems, temporal and spatial variability in TP is usually around the order of ±0.4 TP (Hannides et al 2009;Choy et al 2012;Décima et al 2013;Choy et al 2015;Miyachi et al 2015;Bradley et al 2016;Laiz-Carrión et al 2019). Even small shifts in TP can be associated with significant food web disruptions and represent considerable changes in energy transfer up to higher level consumers (Vander Zanden et al 1999).…”
Section: Comments and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%