2017 International Conference on Military Communications and Information Systems (ICMCIS) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/icmcis.2017.7956477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approach towards achieving interoperability between military land vehicle and robotic systems

Abstract: The battlefield scenarios are changing around the world presenting new challenges for the military. Battlefield environments have moved from the open to urban and constricted spaces forcing the military to adopt new doctrines and tactics for effective attack and defence. Whilst there have been many advances at the equipment level to support the ground forces i.e. the evolution of military vehicles and the introduction of robotic systems, there still exists a big gap in making these two entities work together. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As there exist many standards, with many of the focusing on different aspects of interoperability, i.e., inter-vehicle, intra-vehicle or command and control, there has been some attempts to bridge some of the standards together. In Pradhan et al (2017a), an approach to bridge the UGV IOP standard to NGVA is proposed, and in Pradhan et al (2017b) this is expanded to also include military internet of things standards. There are also examples of efforts to join the land domain with other domains, for instance in Elliott et al (2019) where the possible interoperability between VICTORY and future airborne capability environment (FACE) Standards were explored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As there exist many standards, with many of the focusing on different aspects of interoperability, i.e., inter-vehicle, intra-vehicle or command and control, there has been some attempts to bridge some of the standards together. In Pradhan et al (2017a), an approach to bridge the UGV IOP standard to NGVA is proposed, and in Pradhan et al (2017b) this is expanded to also include military internet of things standards. There are also examples of efforts to join the land domain with other domains, for instance in Elliott et al (2019) where the possible interoperability between VICTORY and future airborne capability environment (FACE) Standards were explored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%