“…In the recent years, a variety of linguistic aggregation operators have been developed. Xu 23 classified these linguistic aggregation operators into five categories: (1) the linguistic aggregation operators which are based on linear ordering, such as the linguistic max and min operators 26,27,28,29,30 , linguistic median operator 28,29,30 , linguistic weighted median opera-tor 28,29,30 ; (2) the linguistic aggregation operators which are based on the extension principle, such as linguistic OWA operator 1,2,12 , inverse-LOWA operator 3 , linguistic weighted OWA operator 13 , these operators make computations on the fuzzy numbers that support the semantics of the linguistic labels; (3) the linguistic aggregation operators which are based on symbols 4,7 , these operators make computations on the indexes of the linguistic labels; (4) the linguistic aggregation operators which are based on the 2-tuple linguistic representation model, such as 2-tuple arithmetic mean operator 5,6 , 2-tuple OWA operator 5,8,9 , 2-tuple weighted geometric averaging (TWGA) operator 22 , 2-tuple ordered weighted geometric averaging (TOWGA) operator 22 ; (5) the linguistic aggregation operators which compute with words directly, such as extended ordered weighted averaging (EOWA) operator 16 , uncertain linguistic ordered weighted operator 10,11,17 , induced uncertain linguistic OWA operator 14,18 . For the linguistic aggregation operators in (1) − (3), the results usually do not match any of the initial linguistic terms and some approximation processes must be developed to express the results in the initial expression domain, which produces the loss of information and the lack of precision.…”